Following my Order issued on 7th august 2026, this call for applications is published for one position of Assistant Professor to the disciplinary area of Chemical Engineering at the Faculty of Engineering of the University of Porto. The application procedure will remain in force for a period of thirty working days as from the working day immediately following the publication of this Notice in the Official Gazette.

1. Applicable legal provisions:

Articles 37 to 51, 61 and 62-A of the Statute of the University Teaching Career (ECDU – Estatuto da Carreira Docente Universitária), republished by Decree-Law No. 205/2009, of 31 August, and amended by Law No. 8/2010, of 13 May, and the Regulations for the Recruitment of Full, Associate and Assistant Professors of the University of Porto (hereinafter referred to as Regulation), approved by Order No. 12913/2010, published in the Official Gazette, 2nd series, no. 154, of 10 August and amended by Resolution (extract) no. 380/2019, published in the Official Gazette, 2nd series, no. 64, of 1 April.

2. Eligible candidates:

Under the terms of Article 41-A of the ECDU, only those who hold a PhD degree may be admitted to this competition.

Holders of academic degrees awarded by foreign higher education institutions must have their doctoral degree recognised by a Portuguese higher education institution under Decree-Law No. 66/2018 of 16 August, in its current wording, by the deadline for signing the contract.

3. Approval on absolute merit

3.1. In the absence of grounds for rejecting the applications, the Jury will deliberate on their approval or non-approval on absolute merit, by justified nominal vote, abstentions not being permitted.

3.2. A candidate is considered to have passed on absolute merit if they are approved by an absolute majority of the voting jury members.

3.3. The approval of candidates on absolute merit depends on verifying the suitability of their scientific, pedagogical, and professional curriculum to the disciplinary area for which the competition is open, as well as compliance with the minimum requirements defined in this notice.

3.4. For the purposes of the evaluation referred to in the previous point, a favorable vote must be based on the cumulative fulfillment of the following qualitative and quantitative circumstances or requirements:

1. The candidate must hold a PhD in Chemical and Biological Engineering, or another related engineering field, with a basic education (Bachelor's and/or Master's or Integrated Master's degree) in engineering, with a proven focus on the sub-area of Engineering of Systems and Product, Project and Management;
2. The candidate must possess a comprehensive curriculum that the jury considers, with due justification, to demonstrate scientific and pedagogical merit, research capacity, and developed activity, compatible with the disciplinary area for which the competition was opened and appropriate to the respective teaching category, as documented in the information submitted to the competition.
3. possess a minimum of 10 (ten) scientific publications indexed in Clarivate Analytics Web of Science or Scopus or industrial experience in management/technological innovation within a company and associated with Engineering Projects for a minimum of 5 years.

4. Evaluation and ranking on relative merit

Once the candidates approved on absolute merit have been definitively identified, they are ranked on relative merit, based on the aspects and criteria of ranking, their respective weighting and final assessment system, established in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 6 of article 50 of the ECDU and article 16 of the Regulations for Recruitment Competitions for Full, Associate and Assistant Professors of the University of Porto.

4.1. Evaluation methodology

Candidates approved on absolute merit are subject to a curricular assessment, which may be complemented by a public presentation hearing, to which candidates approved on absolute merit will submit themselves, aimed at clarifying aspects related to the curriculum and the scientific-pedagogical plan, taking into account the general functions assigned to university teachers by article 4 of the ECDU, focusing on the aspects and respective criteria identified below.

4.2. Aspects of the evaluation

Without prejudice to the minimum requirements identified in point 3.4 of this notice, the evaluation of candidates will focus on the following aspects and scientific-pedagogical project, emphasizing curricular aspects in the disciplinary area for which the competition was opened, with particular emphasis on the sub-area of Engineering of Systems and Product, Project and Management, especially valuing the work developed in the last 5 years, up to the day before the deadline for submitting applications. The following are requirements for curricular evaluation: i) Possessing experience in management/technological innovation within a company and associated with an Engineering Project; ii) Possessing mastery of project development support tools, namely process simulators, energy integration and economic evaluation; iii) Possessing teaching experience in higher education, in the disciplinary area and sub-area of the competition.

1. Scientific Merit (VMC) – 30%
2. Experience and Pedagogical Merit (VEMP) – 20%
3. Tasks of University Outreach and Economic and Social Enhancement of Knowledge (VTC) - 20%
4. University Management (VGU) – 5%
5. Scientific-Pedagogical Project (PCP) – 25%

4.3. Evaluation criteria

The criteria to be considered in the evaluation of each of the assessment aspects and the Scientific-Pedagogical project identified in the previous point, and the weighting to be assigned to each of them in the final classification, are those detailed below, without prejudice to the minimum requirements identified in point 3.4 of this notice, if applicable:

4.3.1. Criteria for assessing the Scientific Merit dimension(VMC) – 30%

4.3.1.1. MC1 — Scientific production

Quality and quantity of scientific production in the specific area and sub-area for which the competition is open (books, journal articles, conference proceedings, conference papers), expressed by the number and type of publications and the recognition given to them by the scientific community (reflected in the quality of the publication venues and the references made to them by other authors).

4.3.1.2. MC2 — Coordination and implementation of research projects

The quality and quantity of scientific projects in which the applicant participated in the specific area and sub-area for which the competition is open, funded on a competitive basis by public funds, through national or international agencies or by companies, and the results obtained in them, giving relevance to project coordination. The quality assessment should consider the amount of funding obtained, the level of rigor of the funding competition, the evaluations of the projects carried out, and the prototypes developed, particularly if they resulted in products or services.

4.3.1.3. MC3 — Intervention in the scientific and professional communities

Capacity for intervention in the scientific and professional communities, expressed, in particular, through collaboration in the editing of journals, the presentation of invited lectures, participation in academic juries outside the institution itself, as well as through activities with recognized impact, namely the awarding of prizes or other distinctions, in the specific area and sub-area for which the competition is open.

4.3.2. Criteria for evaluation of the Experience and Pedagogic Merit dimension(VEMP) – 20%

4.3.2.1. EMP1 — Production of teaching materials and participation in projects with an impact on the teaching/learning process

Quality and quantity of teaching materials produced by the candidate, publications of a pedagogical nature in prestigious international journals or conferences, as well as participation in projects to improve the teaching/learning process, including the reformulation or development of curricular unit programs, in the specific area and sub-area for which the competition is open.

4.3.2.2. EMP2 — Teaching activity

Experience, scope and quality of teaching activity carried out by the candidate in the area and sub-area for which the competition is open. Whenever possible, the evaluation of the quality of the teaching activity carried out by the candidate will use the results of objective methods based on opinion surveys (pedagogical surveys).

4.3.3. Criteria for evaluation of the Tasks of University Extension and Economic and Social Valorization of Knowledge dimension(VTC) – 20%

4.3.3.1. TC1 — Patents, registration and ownership of rights, preparation of technical standards and legislation

Authorship and co-authorship of patents, registration of intellectual property rights for software, mathematical methods, and rules of mental activity. Participation in the drafting of legislation and technical standards.

4.3.3.2. TC2 — Consulting services and study and development contracts

Coordination and participation in consulting activities involving the business sector and the public sector. The evaluation of this criterion should also take into account the economic value of the research results achieved, measured by the development and technology transfer contracts they generated and the spin-off companies to whose creation they have contributed, in the area and sub-area in which the competition is open.

4.3.3.3. TC3 — Dissemination of science and technology

Coordination and participation in scientific and technological dissemination initiatives with the scientific community (e.g., organizing congresses and conferences) and for diverse audiences, and publications of scientific and technological dissemination in the area and sub-area for which the competition is open.

4.3.4. Criteria for evaluating the University Management dimension (VGU) – 5%

4.3.4.1. GU - University management activities.

The candidate's participation and performance in scientific, pedagogical, or institutional management activities will be evaluated.

4.3.5. Criteria for evaluating the Scientific-Pedagogical Project dimension(PCP) – 25%

Plan relating to research lines in the area of Chemical Engineering, in the sub-area of Engineering of Systems and Product, Project and Management. The candidate must frame the future research they intend to carry out, contextualizing the state of the art and the research strategies they propose to adopt. The articulation of this plan with teaching in the disciplinary area and sub-area for which the competition is open must also be made explicit. A document with a maximum of 10 A4 pages consisting of two parts must be submitted: (i) proposal of research activities that the candidate intends to develop during the first five years of their activity as an Assistant Professor; and (ii) pedagogical proposal of a curricular unit under the responsibility of the DEQB from one of the study cycles with a high contribution from the DEQB (L. EQ, M. EQ, L.BIO, M.BIO, L. EA and M. EA).

5. Working methodology of the jury

5.1. Candidates' scores

Each member of the jury makes a reasoned assessment, scoring each candidate in relation to each dimension, on a scale of 0 to 100 points, rounded to the nearest tenth, taking into account the criteria approved for each aspect, with a level of demand adjusted to the category for which the competition is open.

5.2. Public hearing

The jury has the possibility to hold a public hearing under equal circumstances for all candidates approved on absolute merit with the purpose of personally clarifying the evaluation elements contained in the documentation submitted by them.

Should it be necessary to hold these public hearings, they shall take place between the 30th and the 70th day following the deadline for submission of candidacy, and all candidates shall be informed via the Apply platform, at least ten working days in advance, of the date and place where these public hearings shall take place.

5.3. Final Result

The Final Result (RF) for each candidate's assessment by each member of the Jury is calculated using a formula that weights the various components:

RF= (0,30*VMC) + (0,20*VEMP) + (0,20*VTC) + (0,05*VGU) + (0,25*VPCP)

which reflects the weightings associated with each component, as set out in the table in Annex I.

Following the individual reasoned assessment, each member of the Jury draws up their own ranked list of candidates, which they use when voting to reach a decision and determine the final ranking of the candidates in accordance with point 4, without the possibility of a tie between candidates in the final ranking.

4. Jury deliberations

5.4.1. Any resolution will result from article 17, paragraph 12, of the Regulation, applicable by virtue of article 83-A of the ECDU, which determined the approval of the same with a view to the implementation of the rules of that legal diploma, covering the procedural procedure of the competitions, namely the evaluation and final classification system.

Thus, under the terms of article 17, paragraph 12 of the aforementioned Regulation, the jury will deliberate through a roll-call vote based on the selection criteria adopted and disclosed for the approval and ranking of the candidates, with an absolute majority being required for any deliberation, and abstentions are not allowed.

5.4.2. Ranking methodology

In the various votes, each member of the jury must respect his or her ranking list, observing the following in the votes:

1. the first voting round is intended to determine the candidate placed in 1st place, by counting the number of votes that each candidate obtained for that place;
2. if a candidate obtains an absolute majority of the votes for 1st place, he or she is placed in the respective position and removed from the voting rounds and the procedure to choose the candidate for 2nd place begins;
3. if no candidate obtains an absolute majority of the votes for the 1st place, a new voting round begins, only among the candidates who obtained votes for the 1st place, upon removing the least voted candidate in the previous vote for that place;
4. if there is a tie between two or more candidates in the position of the least voted, a tie-breaking vote is held only between them, counting the number of relative first positions of each one, from which the least voted candidate is removed;
5. If a tie still remains between two or more candidates in the position of the least voted, but the number of those candidates has been reduced in relation to the previous voting round, a new tie-breaker vote shall be held only between the candidates tied for the position of the least voted, counting the number of relative first positions of each one, the least voted being removed;
6. if the tie still remains between two or more candidates in the position of the least voted, without the number of candidates tied in the position of the least voted having been reduced, in relation to the previous round of voting, the decision will be made by the quality vote of the President or by a casting vote, according to the situation. The candidate voted for by the President will be included in the subsequent voting round for the same place;
7. if there is a tie when there are only two or more candidates left for the 1st place, the tie-breaker is made through the casting vote of the President of the jury or by the exercise of the tie-breaking vote, as the case may be;
8. Once the candidate for the 1st place is chosen, he leaves the voting process and the selection procedure for the candidate to be placed in 2nd place begins, repeating the process referred to in the previous paragraphs for the subsequent places until a single ordered list of all the candidates is obtained.

6. Submission of applications

6.1. Submission of applications

Candidates must access and register on the electronic platform www.apply.up.pt to submit their application, selecting the procedure to which they wish to apply (procedure code: DOCPUB-FEUP-26-19), until the deadline.

To submit an application, the sections available on the Apply UP online platform under My Application must be completed.

6.2. Instruction of applications:

The application must be accompanied by the following documents, under penalty of exclusion:

1. Doctorate certificate, except for cases corresponding to the award of a Doctorate degree from the University of Porto. Candidates who are selected for the position to be filled and hold a doctoral degree obtained abroad must submit recognition or registration (as applicable) of their degree at the time of signing the contract, in accordance with Decree-Law No. 66/2018 of 16 August, under penalty of exclusion;
2. Curriculum Vitae, containing all information relevant to the assessment of the application, as well as demonstrating compliance with the criteria set out in point 3 of this call for applications, organised in accordance with the ranking criteria set out in paragraph 4 of this call for applications, namely information relating to scientific publications from the Clarivate Analytics Web of Science/ or SCOPUS databases, including journal quartiles, journal impact factors and citation indicators, excluding self-citations; the candidate must structure their CV in such a way as to facilitate the rapid and comprehensive identification of their contribution, within the disciplinary area for which the competition is open, under each of the sub-points of point 4;
3. A summary document to accompany the CV, the information in which must be verifiable and contextualised within the main document and other supporting documentation submitted; it must be completed in full, dated and signed, in accordance with the mandatory form available on the Apply platform;
4. Works and evidence of the activities mentioned in the CV submitted, which enable the criteria set out in points 3.4 and 4.3 of this call for applications to be verified and assessed. In addition, candidates may highlight in their CV up to ten of these works or activities which they consider most representative of the work they have carried out, stating the reasons for selecting these particular documents;
5. Scientific and pedagogical project, in PDF format, not exceeding 10 A4 pages (Arial font, size 11, 1.5 line spacing and 2.5 cm margins).

6.3. The documents referred to in point 6.2 of this Call for Applications must be submitted via the Apply UP platform in a non-editable PDF format.

6.4. For the purposes of assessing applications, documents accessed via hyperlinks or external storage platforms (drives) will not be considered, with the exception of hyperlinks leading to publications identified by a DOI.

6.5. Failure to comply with the provisions of point 6.1 shall result in the exclusion of the application.

6.6. Failure to submit, or late submission of the documents referred to in paragraphs a) to e) of point 6.2 shall result in the non-admission of the application.

7. Notification of the results and requests for a prior hearing

7.1. The Human Resources Service of the Centre for Common Resources and Services of the University of Porto will notify the candidates of the order of administrative admission or non-admission to the competition, which will be based on compliance or non-compliance with the requirements required in the legislation in force and in paragraph 2 of this notice, and the conditions established regarding the application instruction referred to in paragraph 6.2.

7.2. The candidates who have not been admitted administratively, or have not been approved on absolute merit, as well as candidates who appear on the ranked list of candidates in positions that do not allow them to fill the post announced, may request a prior hearing under the terms of Articles 121 and 122 of the Code of Administrative Procedures (CPA). All candidates are notified of the final resolution approved by the Rector.

7.3. Notifications are made by publication on the Apply UP electronic platform, pursuant to Article 112(1)(c) of the CPA, and take effect pursuant to Article 113 of the CPA. The deadline for candidates to make a written statement is ten working days.

8. Composition of the Jury

President:

Professor Rui Artur Bártolo Calçada, Director and Full Professor at the Faculty of Engineering of the University of Porto, acting under the powers delegated by Order No. 9293/2026, published in the Official Gazette, 2nd series, no. 140, of 22 July.

Members:

Professor Carlos Manuel Santos da Silva, PhD, Full Professor at the Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Coimbra;

Professor Marco Paulo Seabra dos Reis, Associate Professor with Aggregation at the Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Coimbra;

Professor Henrique Aníbal Santos de Matos, Full Professor at the Instituto Superior Técnico, University of Lisbon;

Professor Lígia Raquel Marona Rodrigues, Associate Professor with Aggregation at the School of Engineering, University of Minho;

Professor Manuel Fernando Ribeiro Pereira, Full Professor at the Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto.

Professor Fernão Domingos de Montenegro Baptista Malheiro de Magalhães, Full Professor at the Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto;

Professor Fernando Gomes Martins, Associate Professor with Aggregation at the Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto;

9. Other provisions

Joint Order No. 373/2000, of 31 March, of the Minister for the Reform of the State and Public Administration and the Minister for Equality, determines that the following mention must be made in entrance and access competitions:

In compliance with Article 9 h) of the Constitution, the Public Administration, as an employer, actively promotes a policy of equal opportunities between men and women in access to employment and professional progression, scrupulously ensuring that any form of discrimination is avoided.

In this sense, the terms "candidate(s)", "teacher(s)" and other similar terms are not used in this notice to refer to the gender of the people.

Likewise, no candidate may be privileged, benefited, prejudiced or deprived of any right or exempt from any duty on the grounds of, in particular, ancestry, age, sexual orientation, marital status, family situation, economic situation, education, origin or social condition, genetic heritage, reduced work capacity, disability, chronic illness, nationality, ethnic origin or race, territory of origin, language, religion, political or ideological convictions and union membership.

7 de agosto de 2026 – The Rector, Professor Pedro Nuno Teixeira

Annex I

Table 1. Weightings for the components and respective criteria of the curriculum assessment (CA)

Scientific Merit [VMC] (30 %):

• Scientific production [MC1] (40 %);
• Coordination and implementation of research projects [MC2] (40 %);
• Intervention in the scientific and professional communities [MC3] (20 %).

Experience and Pedagogical Merit [VEMP] (20 %):

• Production of teaching materials [EMP1] (35 %);
• Teaching activity [EMP2] (65 %);

Tasks of University Outreach and Economic and Social Enhancement of Knowledge [VTC] (20 %):

• Patents, registration and ownership of rights [TC1] (30 %);
• Consulting services [TC2] (50 %);
• Dissemination of science and technology [TC3] (20 %);

University Management [VGU] 5 %):

• University management activities [GU] (100 %);

Scientific-Pedagogical Project [PCP] (25 %).

Following my Order issued on 7th august 2026, this call for applications is published for one position of Assistant Professor to the disciplinary area of Chemical Engineering at the Faculty of Engineering of the University of Porto. The application procedure will remain in force for a period of thirty working days as from the working day immediately following the publication of this Notice in the Official Gazette.

1. Applicable legal provisions:

Articles 37 to 51, 61 and 62-A of the Statute of the University Teaching Career (ECDU – Estatuto da Carreira Docente Universitária), republished by Decree-Law No. 205/2009, of 31 August, and amended by Law No. 8/2010, of 13 May, and the Regulations for the Recruitment of Full, Associate and Assistant Professors of the University of Porto (hereinafter referred to as Regulation), approved by Order No. 12913/2010, published in the Official Gazette, 2nd series, no. 154, of 10 August and amended by Resolution (extract) no. 380/2019, published in the Official Gazette, 2nd series, no. 64, of 1 April.

2. Eligible candidates:

Under the terms of Article 41-A of the ECDU, only those who hold a PhD degree may be admitted to this competition.

Holders of academic degrees awarded by foreign higher education institutions must have their doctoral degree recognised by a Portuguese higher education institution under Decree-Law No. 66/2018 of 16 August, in its current wording, by the deadline for signing the contract.

3. Approval on absolute merit

3.1. In the absence of grounds for rejecting the applications, the Jury will deliberate on their approval or non-approval on absolute merit, by justified nominal vote, abstentions not being permitted.

3.2. A candidate is considered to have passed on absolute merit if they are approved by an absolute majority of the voting jury members.

3.3. The approval of candidates on absolute merit depends on verifying the suitability of their scientific, pedagogical, and professional curriculum to the disciplinary area for which the competition is open, as well as compliance with the minimum requirements defined in this notice.

3.4. For the purposes of the evaluation referred to in the previous point, a favorable vote must be based on the cumulative fulfillment of the following qualitative and quantitative circumstances or requirements:

1. The candidate must hold a PhD in Chemical and Biological Engineering, or another related engineering field, with a basic education (Bachelor's and/or Master's or Integrated Master's degree) in engineering, with a proven focus on the sub-area of Engineering of Systems and Product, Project and Management;
2. The candidate must possess a comprehensive curriculum that the jury considers, with due justification, to demonstrate scientific and pedagogical merit, research capacity, and developed activity, compatible with the disciplinary area for which the competition was opened and appropriate to the respective teaching category, as documented in the information submitted to the competition.
3. possess a minimum of 10 (ten) scientific publications indexed in Clarivate Analytics Web of Science or Scopus or industrial experience in management/technological innovation within a company and associated with Engineering Projects for a minimum of 5 years.

4. Evaluation and ranking on relative merit

Once the candidates approved on absolute merit have been definitively identified, they are ranked on relative merit, based on the aspects and criteria of ranking, their respective weighting and final assessment system, established in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 6 of article 50 of the ECDU and article 16 of the Regulations for Recruitment Competitions for Full, Associate and Assistant Professors of the University of Porto.

4.1. Evaluation methodology

Candidates approved on absolute merit are subject to a curricular assessment, which may be complemented by a public presentation hearing, to which candidates approved on absolute merit will submit themselves, aimed at clarifying aspects related to the curriculum and the scientific-pedagogical plan, taking into account the general functions assigned to university teachers by article 4 of the ECDU, focusing on the aspects and respective criteria identified below.

4.2. Aspects of the evaluation

Without prejudice to the minimum requirements identified in point 3.4 of this notice, the evaluation of candidates will focus on the following aspects and scientific-pedagogical project, emphasizing curricular aspects in the disciplinary area for which the competition was opened, with particular emphasis on the sub-area of Engineering of Systems and Product, Project and Management, especially valuing the work developed in the last 5 years, up to the day before the deadline for submitting applications. The following are requirements for curricular evaluation: i) Possessing experience in management/technological innovation within a company and associated with an Engineering Project; ii) Possessing mastery of project development support tools, namely process simulators, energy integration and economic evaluation; iii) Possessing teaching experience in higher education, in the disciplinary area and sub-area of the competition.

1. Scientific Merit (VMC) – 30%
2. Experience and Pedagogical Merit (VEMP) – 20%
3. Tasks of University Outreach and Economic and Social Enhancement of Knowledge (VTC) - 20%
4. University Management (VGU) – 5%
5. Scientific-Pedagogical Project (PCP) – 25%

4.3. Evaluation criteria

The criteria to be considered in the evaluation of each of the assessment aspects and the Scientific-Pedagogical project identified in the previous point, and the weighting to be assigned to each of them in the final classification, are those detailed below, without prejudice to the minimum requirements identified in point 3.4 of this notice, if applicable:

4.3.1. Criteria for assessing the Scientific Merit dimension(VMC) – 30%

4.3.1.1. MC1 — Scientific production

Quality and quantity of scientific production in the specific area and sub-area for which the competition is open (books, journal articles, conference proceedings, conference papers), expressed by the number and type of publications and the recognition given to them by the scientific community (reflected in the quality of the publication venues and the references made to them by other authors).

4.3.1.2. MC2 — Coordination and implementation of research projects

The quality and quantity of scientific projects in which the applicant participated in the specific area and sub-area for which the competition is open, funded on a competitive basis by public funds, through national or international agencies or by companies, and the results obtained in them, giving relevance to project coordination. The quality assessment should consider the amount of funding obtained, the level of rigor of the funding competition, the evaluations of the projects carried out, and the prototypes developed, particularly if they resulted in products or services.

4.3.1.3. MC3 — Intervention in the scientific and professional communities

Capacity for intervention in the scientific and professional communities, expressed, in particular, through collaboration in the editing of journals, the presentation of invited lectures, participation in academic juries outside the institution itself, as well as through activities with recognized impact, namely the awarding of prizes or other distinctions, in the specific area and sub-area for which the competition is open.

4.3.2. Criteria for evaluation of the Experience and Pedagogic Merit dimension(VEMP) – 20%

4.3.2.1. EMP1 — Production of teaching materials and participation in projects with an impact on the teaching/learning process

Quality and quantity of teaching materials produced by the candidate, publications of a pedagogical nature in prestigious international journals or conferences, as well as participation in projects to improve the teaching/learning process, including the reformulation or development of curricular unit programs, in the specific area and sub-area for which the competition is open.

4.3.2.2. EMP2 — Teaching activity

Experience, scope and quality of teaching activity carried out by the candidate in the area and sub-area for which the competition is open. Whenever possible, the evaluation of the quality of the teaching activity carried out by the candidate will use the results of objective methods based on opinion surveys (pedagogical surveys).

4.3.3. Criteria for evaluation of the Tasks of University Extension and Economic and Social Valorization of Knowledge dimension(VTC) – 20%

4.3.3.1. TC1 — Patents, registration and ownership of rights, preparation of technical standards and legislation

Authorship and co-authorship of patents, registration of intellectual property rights for software, mathematical methods, and rules of mental activity. Participation in the drafting of legislation and technical standards.

4.3.3.2. TC2 — Consulting services and study and development contracts

Coordination and participation in consulting activities involving the business sector and the public sector. The evaluation of this criterion should also take into account the economic value of the research results achieved, measured by the development and technology transfer contracts they generated and the spin-off companies to whose creation they have contributed, in the area and sub-area in which the competition is open.

4.3.3.3. TC3 — Dissemination of science and technology

Coordination and participation in scientific and technological dissemination initiatives with the scientific community (e.g., organizing congresses and conferences) and for diverse audiences, and publications of scientific and technological dissemination in the area and sub-area for which the competition is open.

4.3.4. Criteria for evaluating the University Management dimension (VGU) – 5%

4.3.4.1. GU - University management activities.

The candidate's participation and performance in scientific, pedagogical, or institutional management activities will be evaluated.

4.3.5. Criteria for evaluating the Scientific-Pedagogical Project dimension(PCP) – 25%

Plan relating to research lines in the area of Chemical Engineering, in the sub-area of Engineering of Systems and Product, Project and Management. The candidate must frame the future research they intend to carry out, contextualizing the state of the art and the research strategies they propose to adopt. The articulation of this plan with teaching in the disciplinary area and sub-area for which the competition is open must also be made explicit. A document with a maximum of 10 A4 pages consisting of two parts must be submitted: (i) proposal of research activities that the candidate intends to develop during the first five years of their activity as an Assistant Professor; and (ii) pedagogical proposal of a curricular unit under the responsibility of the DEQB from one of the study cycles with a high contribution from the DEQB (L. EQ, M. EQ, L.BIO, M.BIO, L. EA and M. EA).

5. Working methodology of the jury

5.1. Candidates' scores

Each member of the jury makes a reasoned assessment, scoring each candidate in relation to each dimension, on a scale of 0 to 100 points, rounded to the nearest tenth, taking into account the criteria approved for each aspect, with a level of demand adjusted to the category for which the competition is open.

5.2. Public hearing

The jury has the possibility to hold a public hearing under equal circumstances for all candidates approved on absolute merit with the purpose of personally clarifying the evaluation elements contained in the documentation submitted by them.

Should it be necessary to hold these public hearings, they shall take place between the 30th and the 70th day following the deadline for submission of candidacy, and all candidates shall be informed via the Apply platform, at least ten working days in advance, of the date and place where these public hearings shall take place.

5.3. Final Result

The Final Result (RF) for each candidate's assessment by each member of the Jury is calculated using a formula that weights the various components:

RF= (0,30*VMC) + (0,20*VEMP) + (0,20*VTC) + (0,05*VGU) + (0,25*VPCP)

which reflects the weightings associated with each component, as set out in the table in Annex I.

Following the individual reasoned assessment, each member of the Jury draws up their own ranked list of candidates, which they use when voting to reach a decision and determine the final ranking of the candidates in accordance with point 4, without the possibility of a tie between candidates in the final ranking.

4. Jury deliberations

5.4.1. Any resolution will result from article 17, paragraph 12, of the Regulation, applicable by virtue of article 83-A of the ECDU, which determined the approval of the same with a view to the implementation of the rules of that legal diploma, covering the procedural procedure of the competitions, namely the evaluation and final classification system.

Thus, under the terms of article 17, paragraph 12 of the aforementioned Regulation, the jury will deliberate through a roll-call vote based on the selection criteria adopted and disclosed for the approval and ranking of the candidates, with an absolute majority being required for any deliberation, and abstentions are not allowed.

5.4.2. Ranking methodology

In the various votes, each member of the jury must respect his or her ranking list, observing the following in the votes:

1. the first voting round is intended to determine the candidate placed in 1st place, by counting the number of votes that each candidate obtained for that place;
2. if a candidate obtains an absolute majority of the votes for 1st place, he or she is placed in the respective position and removed from the voting rounds and the procedure to choose the candidate for 2nd place begins;
3. if no candidate obtains an absolute majority of the votes for the 1st place, a new voting round begins, only among the candidates who obtained votes for the 1st place, upon removing the least voted candidate in the previous vote for that place;
4. if there is a tie between two or more candidates in the position of the least voted, a tie-breaking vote is held only between them, counting the number of relative first positions of each one, from which the least voted candidate is removed;
5. If a tie still remains between two or more candidates in the position of the least voted, but the number of those candidates has been reduced in relation to the previous voting round, a new tie-breaker vote shall be held only between the candidates tied for the position of the least voted, counting the number of relative first positions of each one, the least voted being removed;
6. if the tie still remains between two or more candidates in the position of the least voted, without the number of candidates tied in the position of the least voted having been reduced, in relation to the previous round of voting, the decision will be made by the quality vote of the President or by a casting vote, according to the situation. The candidate voted for by the President will be included in the subsequent voting round for the same place;
7. if there is a tie when there are only two or more candidates left for the 1st place, the tie-breaker is made through the casting vote of the President of the jury or by the exercise of the tie-breaking vote, as the case may be;
8. Once the candidate for the 1st place is chosen, he leaves the voting process and the selection procedure for the candidate to be placed in 2nd place begins, repeating the process referred to in the previous paragraphs for the subsequent places until a single ordered list of all the candidates is obtained.

6. Submission of applications

6.1. Submission of applications

Candidates must access and register on the electronic platform www.apply.up.pt to submit their application, selecting the procedure to which they wish to apply (procedure code: DOCPUB-FEUP-26-19), until the deadline.

To submit an application, the sections available on the Apply UP online platform under My Application must be completed.

6.2. Instruction of applications:

The application must be accompanied by the following documents, under penalty of exclusion:

1. Doctorate certificate, except for cases corresponding to the award of a Doctorate degree from the University of Porto. Candidates who are selected for the position to be filled and hold a doctoral degree obtained abroad must submit recognition or registration (as applicable) of their degree at the time of signing the contract, in accordance with Decree-Law No. 66/2018 of 16 August, under penalty of exclusion;
2. Curriculum Vitae, containing all information relevant to the assessment of the application, as well as demonstrating compliance with the criteria set out in point 3 of this call for applications, organised in accordance with the ranking criteria set out in paragraph 4 of this call for applications, namely information relating to scientific publications from the Clarivate Analytics Web of Science/ or SCOPUS databases, including journal quartiles, journal impact factors and citation indicators, excluding self-citations; the candidate must structure their CV in such a way as to facilitate the rapid and comprehensive identification of their contribution, within the disciplinary area for which the competition is open, under each of the sub-points of point 4;
3. A summary document to accompany the CV, the information in which must be verifiable and contextualised within the main document and other supporting documentation submitted; it must be completed in full, dated and signed, in accordance with the mandatory form available on the Apply platform;
4. Works and evidence of the activities mentioned in the CV submitted, which enable the criteria set out in points 3.4 and 4.3 of this call for applications to be verified and assessed. In addition, candidates may highlight in their CV up to ten of these works or activities which they consider most representative of the work they have carried out, stating the reasons for selecting these particular documents;
5. Scientific and pedagogical project, in PDF format, not exceeding 10 A4 pages (Arial font, size 11, 1.5 line spacing and 2.5 cm margins).

6.3. The documents referred to in point 6.2 of this Call for Applications must be submitted via the Apply UP platform in a non-editable PDF format.

6.4. For the purposes of assessing applications, documents accessed via hyperlinks or external storage platforms (drives) will not be considered, with the exception of hyperlinks leading to publications identified by a DOI.

6.5. Failure to comply with the provisions of point 6.1 shall result in the exclusion of the application.

6.6. Failure to submit, or late submission of the documents referred to in paragraphs a) to e) of point 6.2 shall result in the non-admission of the application.

7. Notification of the results and requests for a prior hearing

7.1. The Human Resources Service of the Centre for Common Resources and Services of the University of Porto will notify the candidates of the order of administrative admission or non-admission to the competition, which will be based on compliance or non-compliance with the requirements required in the legislation in force and in paragraph 2 of this notice, and the conditions established regarding the application instruction referred to in paragraph 6.2.

7.2. The candidates who have not been admitted administratively, or have not been approved on absolute merit, as well as candidates who appear on the ranked list of candidates in positions that do not allow them to fill the post announced, may request a prior hearing under the terms of Articles 121 and 122 of the Code of Administrative Procedures (CPA). All candidates are notified of the final resolution approved by the Rector.

7.3. Notifications are made by publication on the Apply UP electronic platform, pursuant to Article 112(1)(c) of the CPA, and take effect pursuant to Article 113 of the CPA. The deadline for candidates to make a written statement is ten working days.

8. Composition of the Jury

President:

Professor Rui Artur Bártolo Calçada, Director and Full Professor at the Faculty of Engineering of the University of Porto, acting under the powers delegated by Order No. 9293/2026, published in the Official Gazette, 2nd series, no. 140, of 22 July.

Members:

Professor Carlos Manuel Santos da Silva, PhD, Full Professor at the Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Coimbra;

Professor Marco Paulo Seabra dos Reis, Associate Professor with Aggregation at the Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Coimbra;

Professor Henrique Aníbal Santos de Matos, Full Professor at the Instituto Superior Técnico, University of Lisbon;

Professor Lígia Raquel Marona Rodrigues, Associate Professor with Aggregation at the School of Engineering, University of Minho;

Professor Manuel Fernando Ribeiro Pereira, Full Professor at the Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto.

Professor Fernão Domingos de Montenegro Baptista Malheiro de Magalhães, Full Professor at the Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto;

Professor Fernando Gomes Martins, Associate Professor with Aggregation at the Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto;

9. Other provisions

Joint Order No. 373/2000, of 31 March, of the Minister for the Reform of the State and Public Administration and the Minister for Equality, determines that the following mention must be made in entrance and access competitions:

In compliance with Article 9 h) of the Constitution, the Public Administration, as an employer, actively promotes a policy of equal opportunities between men and women in access to employment and professional progression, scrupulously ensuring that any form of discrimination is avoided.

In this sense, the terms "candidate(s)", "teacher(s)" and other similar terms are not used in this notice to refer to the gender of the people.

Likewise, no candidate may be privileged, benefited, prejudiced or deprived of any right or exempt from any duty on the grounds of, in particular, ancestry, age, sexual orientation, marital status, family situation, economic situation, education, origin or social condition, genetic heritage, reduced work capacity, disability, chronic illness, nationality, ethnic origin or race, territory of origin, language, religion, political or ideological convictions and union membership.

7 de agosto de 2026 – The Rector, Professor Pedro Nuno Teixeira

Annex I

Table 1. Weightings for the components and respective criteria of the curriculum assessment (CA)

Scientific Merit [VMC] (30 %):

• Scientific production [MC1] (40 %);
• Coordination and implementation of research projects [MC2] (40 %);
• Intervention in the scientific and professional communities [MC3] (20 %).

Experience and Pedagogical Merit [VEMP] (20 %):

• Production of teaching materials [EMP1] (35 %);
• Teaching activity [EMP2] (65 %);

Tasks of University Outreach and Economic and Social Enhancement of Knowledge [VTC] (20 %):

• Patents, registration and ownership of rights [TC1] (30 %);
• Consulting services [TC2] (50 %);
• Dissemination of science and technology [TC3] (20 %);

University Management [VGU] 5 %):

• University management activities [GU] (100 %);

Scientific-Pedagogical Project [PCP] (25 %).