The Spark of the Debate: Why Mathematics Dominates University Admissions
In South Africa, the role of mathematics in determining access to university education has ignited passionate discussions among educators, policymakers, and students alike. At the heart of this controversy is the question of whether stringent mathematics requirements are a necessary gatekeeper for academic rigor or an unfair barrier exacerbating inequality. Recent events, including Universities South Africa's (USAf) thought leadership forum in October 2025, have amplified these voices, with Professor Martin Gustafsson of Stellenbosch University arguing that pure mathematics should be reserved for learners with a strong foundational grasp to boost overall performance and employability.
The debate gained fresh urgency following the 2025 National Senior Certificate (NSC) results, which celebrated a record 88% overall pass rate but revealed stark weaknesses in pure mathematics. Only 34.1% of candidates attempted pure maths, with a pass rate dropping to 64% from 69% the previous year—a decline that experts like Emeritus Professor Michael le Cordeur describe as "heartbreaking" for the nation's future.
Pure Mathematics vs Mathematical Literacy: Decoding the Divide
The National Senior Certificate offers two mathematics pathways: pure mathematics, which delves into algebra, calculus, and geometry, and mathematical literacy, focused on practical applications like budgeting and statistics. While mathematical literacy boasts higher pass rates—around 87% in recent years—it rarely meets university entry criteria for competitive programs. Pure mathematics, despite lower uptake, is the gold standard for fields like engineering, medicine, computer science, and even commerce.
Department of Higher Education and Training (DHET) guidelines stipulate a bachelor's pass for degree studies, but individual universities impose higher hurdles. For instance, a minimum of 50% in pure mathematics is commonplace, with thresholds climbing to 60% or more when paired with physical sciences. This distinction creates a chasm: students excelling in literacy may secure a bachelor's pass but find doors to top programs firmly shut, channeling them toward diplomas or humanities degrees.
The choice, often made in Grade 10, carries lifelong consequences. Schools sometimes steer struggling learners toward literacy to inflate pass rates, a practice criticized by experts like Mr. Lucky Sibanda, who warns it trades short-term gains for long-term career limitations.
2025 Matric Results: Record Highs Hide Mathematics Shortfalls
The Class of 2025 etched history with an 88% NSC pass rate, up from 87.3% in 2024, and a record 345,000 bachelor's passes. Yet, beneath the celebrations lies a troubling trend in gateway subjects. Pure mathematics participation hovered at just 34.1%, with only 64% passing—a regression that saw distinctions dwindle. Accounting and physical sciences also faltered, signaling broader STEM vulnerabilities.
- Mathematics pass rate: 64% (down from 69.1%)
- Distinctions in maths: Declined year-on-year
- Bachelor's passes from no-fee schools: Over 66%, narrowing inequality gaps
Professor Suraiya Naicker of the University of Johannesburg laments this as a setback in an AI-driven era, urging interventions from foundational phases.
University-Specific Hurdles: A Closer Look at Top Institutions
South African universities set Admission Point Score (APS) systems alongside subject minima, prioritizing pure mathematics. At the University of Cape Town (UCT), engineering demands 70%+ in maths and physical sciences; commerce requires at least 60%. The University of the Witwatersrand (Wits) mandates 50% minimum for most faculties, excluding mathematical literacy for science and engineering. Stellenbosch University (SU) aligns with DHET but specifies pure maths for BSc programs, often at 50-60%.
University of Pretoria (UP) echoes this for BEng (50% maths), while Nelson Mandela University rejects literacy for BCom. These policies ensure readiness but exclude thousands: in 2022, under-supply at 50% threshold hit 37%, per RESEP analysis.
UCT's prospectus details these, emphasizing NSFAS-eligible students must meet them too. Discover professor ratings at Rate My Professor to gauge program quality.
Stakeholder Perspectives: Equity, Rigor, and Employability
The debate pits access advocates against quality champions. Proponents of strict requirements, like Mr. Tsibane Nhlanhla from Wits/UP, view maths as the "language of science and technology," vital for innovation.
Industry echoes shortages: Investec reports SA produces 10x fewer maths distinctions needed, fueling STEM gaps.
Bridging the Gap: Programs and Pathways Forward
Extended curriculum programs (ECPs) and bridging courses offer lifelines. UNISA's free MAT0511 bridges literacy to pure maths, while NWU and Belgium Campus provide intensive upgrades.
- UNISA Higher Certificate in Mathematics and Statistics: Builds academic maths skills.
- Private providers like Milpark: Tailored for BCom entry.
- Early interventions: Grade 8 guidance, teacher training.
Policy proposals include centralized info platforms and NDP-aligned targets: 140,000 at 60% by 2030.
Case Studies: Success Stories Amid Challenges
At UWC, maths literacy students transition via foundation programs, boosting throughput 20%. Wits' pre-uni workshops lifted entry rates for quintile 1-3 schools. Industry partnerships, like those with Siemens, fund maths bootcamps, yielding 80% placement in engineering apprenticeships.
Yet challenges persist: Eastern Cape's low 547 black African 60% achievers highlight rural-urban divides.
Economic Implications and Future Outlook
SA's 64th global competitiveness rank ties to maths deficits, stunting GDP growth by 1-2% annually per World Bank estimates. Projections warn persistent shortages unless interventions scale: TIMSS high benchmark must hit 16% by 2029.
Government eyes TVET expansion, but universities urge maths mastery for 50% GER by 2035. AI and green tech demand analytical thinkers—pure maths pipelines are non-negotiable.
Photo by Marlin Clark on Unsplash
Charting a Balanced Path Forward
The mathematics requirements debate underscores a pivotal choice: prioritize volume or velocity in skills development. Solutions blend equity—via bridging and guidance—with excellence through targeted foundational support. Aspiring students, explore university jobs, rate professors at Rate My Professor, and find higher ed jobs or career advice. South Africa's youth deserve pathways that empower, not exclude.