In the wake of the October 7, 2023, Hamas terrorist attacks on Israel, American college campuses have witnessed an unprecedented surge in antisemitic incidents, harassment, and hostility toward Jewish students and faculty. A landmark majority staff report released by the U.S. House Committee on Education and the Workforce on March 17, 2026, titled "How Campuses Became Hotbeds: The Rise of Radical Antisemitism on College Campuses," lays bare the systemic failures that have allowed this crisis to fester. This 59-page document, based on extensive investigations, hearings, and document reviews, attributes the escalation to weak university leadership, radical faculty influence, and activist student groups acting as ringleaders.

The report arrives amid ongoing federal scrutiny, including numerous Title VI investigations by the Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights (OCR). Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination based on race, color, or national origin in programs receiving federal financial assistance, encompassing shared Jewish ancestry and ethnic characteristics. As of early 2026, over 100 universities face such probes related to antisemitic discrimination.

Key Findings from the House Committee Report

The Committee's exhaustive analysis identifies four primary drivers of campus antisemitism. First, university presidents and administrators have demonstrated a consistent lack of decisive action, often equivocating or prioritizing ideological conformity over student safety. In interactions with the Committee, leaders from institutions like Columbia University, Harvard University, and the University of Pennsylvania failed to unequivocally condemn antisemitic rhetoric or enforce conduct codes rigorously.

Second, faculty members are not mere bystanders but active amplifiers. The report documents professors endorsing calls for violence, promoting boycott, divestment, and sanctions (BDS) movements against Israel—often crossing into antisemitic territory—and even seeking to redefine antisemitism to exclude certain anti-Zionist expressions. Examples include faculty at the University of California, Berkeley, and Northwestern University who publicly celebrated Hamas's attacks or isolated Jewish colleagues.

Third, student organizations, particularly chapters of Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP)—a national network advocating for Palestinian rights through BDS and anti-Israel activism—have orchestrated encampments, disruptions, and harassment campaigns. Campuses with Faculty and Staff for Justice in Palestine (FSJP) chapters were seven times more likely to see violence against Jews, according to Committee findings.

• SJP-led protests at Columbia involved blocking Jewish students from classes and chanting phrases deemed antisemitic by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition.
• At DePaul University, SJP affiliates assaulted pro-Israel students, fracturing wrists and causing concussions.

Finally, U.S. universities' overseas branches in the Middle East, such as those operated by Georgetown and Northwestern, exhibit double standards, tolerating antisemitic events without repercussions while stifling pro-Israel speech.

Read the full House Committee report (PDF) for detailed appendices on incidents and timelines.

Alarming Statistics Paint a Dire Picture

Data underscores the crisis's scale. Hillel International tracked 1,287 antisemitic incidents on U.S. campuses during the 2025-2026 academic year as of March 19, 2026—ranging from vandalism and harassment to physical assaults. The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) reports that antisemitic incidents on campuses declined slightly in 2025 from peak post-October 7 levels but remain elevated above pre-2023 baselines.

A January-February 2026 AJC survey found 42% of Jewish college students experienced antisemitism, rising to 68% among those directly affected. Alarmingly, ADL's companion survey of 1,007 non-Jewish undergraduates revealed 48% witnessed or experienced anti-Jewish behavior in the past year, with 48% endorsing at least one antisemitic stereotype.

Case Studies: Failures at Elite Institutions

Columbia University exemplifies leadership lapses. Post-October 7 encampments disrupted classes, with SJP demanding the university's complicity in "genocide." Jewish students reported being spat on, doxxed, and physically intimidated. Federal probes continue, with recent court orders for data disclosure.

Harvard faced backlash after its 2023 presidential hearing testimony equivocated on whether calls for Jewish genocide violated policy. Ongoing OCR investigations scrutinize admissions and campus climate. UPenn's former president resigned amid similar scrutiny, with a judge recently ordering release of Jewish staff lists in an EEOC probe.

Smaller schools like Sarah Lawrence and Pomona saw faculty-led disruptions and unaddressed harassment, per the report.

Photo by Roger Starnes Sr on Unsplash

The Pivotal Role of Faculty and SJP

Faculty at UC Berkeley and UCLA medical schools signed letters praising Hamas, while FSJP chapters coordinated with students. SJP, banned at some schools like Brandeis, organized national "days of rage." The report urges vetting faculty online activity and defunding non-compliant groups.

Signs of Progress: ADL's 2026 Report Card

Not all news is grim. ADL's 2026 Campus Antisemitism Report Card graded 150 schools, with 58% earning A/B—up from 41% in 2025. Top performers: NYU (A), Temple (A), ASU (A). Laggards: CSU-LA (F), UNT (F). Improvements stem from adopting IHRA definitions, mandatory training, and accountability. Explore the full ADL Report Card.

Federal Response: Title VI and Beyond

Over 89 universities face OCR Title VI probes as of 2026, with recent additions like Harvard expansions. USCCR's February 2026 briefing examined federal responses. DOJ task forces visited 10 campuses in 2025.

Path Forward: Recommendations and Solutions

• Adopt IHRA working definition of antisemitism.
• Enforce conduct codes uniformly, suspending disruptive groups.
• Mandate antisemitism training for all.
• Hold faculty accountable via tenure reviews.
• Ensure overseas campuses align with U.S. values.

Universities partnering with ADL via "Six Asks"—clear policies, training, reporting—show quickest gains. Administrators must prioritize safety to restore trust.

Photo by Carlos Gonzalez on Unsplash

Implications for Higher Education and Jewish Student Safety

This crisis erodes academic freedom, deters Jewish enrollment (down 10-20% at some elites), and invites funding cuts. Balanced leadership fostering civil discourse is essential. As ADL notes, 72% of Jewish students feel unwelcome—actionable change is urgent.

Stakeholders, from Hillel to OCR, advocate multi-perspective training distinguishing anti-Zionism from antisemitism. Explore opportunities in safer campuses via higher ed jobs and university jobs.