Texas A&M Lecturer Sues Over Firing After Viral Gender Lesson Video

🎥 The Spark: A Classroom Lesson Goes Viral

In the summer of 2025, Melissa McCoul, a senior lecturer in the English department at Texas A&M University's flagship campus in College Station, was delivering a children's literature course. With over eight years of experience at the institution since joining in 2017, McCoul had taught this specific class multiple times without incident. The curriculum focused on analyzing children's books through various societal lenses, including diversity in modern storytelling.

One lesson centered on the book Jude Saves the World, which features a nonbinary 12-year-old protagonist. McCoul used a PowerPoint slide titled "Why Talk About Queerness At All?" to frame the discussion, alongside a "gender unicorn" graphic—a common educational tool that visually distinguishes between biological sex, gender identity, gender expression, and sexual attraction. This graphic helps students understand nuanced concepts often explored in contemporary children's literature.

During the July 29, 2025, session, a student objected, secretly recording the exchange. The student argued that discussing more than two genders violated their religious beliefs and President Donald Trump's Executive Order signed on January 20, 2025, titled "Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government." This order prohibits federal funding for programs promoting what it terms "gender ideology," defining sex as binary (male or female) based on biology at birth. McCoul responded by asking the student to leave the class if they continued challenging her authority to teach the approved material.

The video quickly spread on social media, amplified by Texas State Representative Brian Harrison (R-Midlothian), who posted it on X (formerly Twitter). It garnered widespread attention, sparking debates on academic content, free speech, and political influence in education. A screenshot of the slide had already circulated earlier, tagging lawmakers and fueling calls for McCoul's removal.

🔍 University Investigation and Swift Termination

Texas A&M placed McCoul on administrative leave shortly after the video surfaced. An associate dean observed her class, but no formal issues were noted initially. Despite this, the university proceeded with an investigation, culminating in her termination on September 2025 for "serious misconduct." The termination letter cited misalignment between her course content and the approved catalog description and syllabus, claiming she ignored multiple directives to adjust it.

McCoul contested this, asserting her lessons fully adhered to the syllabus she had taught successfully for years. Her recent teaching evaluations exceeded expectations, and no prior complaints existed. Notably, university policy for nontenured faculty like lecturers requires a hearing before dismissal for serious misconduct, which Provost Alan Sams was allegedly instructed not to provide.

An eight-person faculty Committee on Academic Freedom, Responsibility, and Tenure unanimously ruled that the university failed to meet the burden of proof for dismissal. However, administrators rejected this recommendation, upholding the firing. Reports indicate political pressure played a role, including contact from Governor Greg Abbott's chief of staff to then-President Mark A. Welsh III urging her removal.

⚖️ The Lawsuit: Allegations of Constitutional Violations

On February 4, 2026, McCoul filed a federal lawsuit in Houston against the Texas A&M University System, its nine regents, Chancellor Glenn Hegar, former President Mark Welsh III, interim President Tommy Williams, Vice Chancellor James Hallmark, and Provost Alan Sams. The suit alleges violations of her First Amendment rights to free speech and academic freedom, Fourteenth Amendment due process protections, and breach of her three-year contract (she was in year two).

Key claims include that the university capitulated to political critics rather than following policy, providing "shifting, false, and nonsensical" reasons for termination. McCoul seeks reinstatement, back pay, punitive damages, and a judicial declaration affirming her teaching was lawful and protected. Supported by the American Association of University Professors (AAUP) and American Federation of Teachers (AFT), who cover her legal fees, she expressed sadness in suing an institution she loves.Texas Tribune coverage details the political pressures involved.

The university, via spokesman Chris Bryan, acknowledged the suit but stated they intend to "vigorously defend" it, declining further comment amid litigation.

📜 Broader Policy Shifts at Texas A&M

McCoul's case unfolds amid sweeping changes at Texas A&M. In late January 2026, the university ended its women's and gender studies program, citing low enrollment and compliance with a new system-wide policy. This policy prohibits courses from "advocating race or gender ideology, or topics related to sexual orientation or gender identity" unless they are non-core undergraduate or graduate-level, demonstrate a "necessary educational purpose," and receive written presidential approval across the system's 12 campuses.

Provost Alan Sams announced reviews of hundreds of syllabi, resulting in six course cancellations and 48 exceptions granted. Chancellor Hegar ordered audits post-incident. These align with Texas state efforts to curb what conservatives call "radical DEI" (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) initiatives, echoing national debates.The Chronicle of Higher Education reports faculty concerns over censorship.

• Elimination of dedicated gender studies programs.
• Required pre-approval for sensitive topics.
• System-wide course audits for ideological content.

🎓 Implications for Academic Freedom Nationwide

This lawsuit highlights tensions in U.S. higher education between state politics and faculty rights. Academic freedom, enshrined in AAUP principles since 1915, protects professors from institutional interference in teaching, provided it aligns with scholarly standards. Public universities, as state actors, are bound by the First Amendment, prohibiting retaliation for protected speech.

In Texas, Senate Bill 17 (2023) banned DEI offices, setting precedents. Trump's executive order influences federally funded institutions indirectly. Critics argue such measures chill diverse curricula; supporters say they refocus on core academics. Governor Abbott's office reiterated: "Radical DEI and gender ideologies will not be forced on students."

Faculty senate resolutions and protests at Texas A&M decry the policy as censorship, fearing broader erosion. PEN America warned of "the death of academic freedom." For lecturers—often nontenured and contract-based—the risks are acute, as job security hinges on evaluations and compliance.

👥 Perspectives from Stakeholders

McCoul's unions view her as a "canary in the coal mine," urging resistance to political meddling. AAUP Texas Conference President Brian Evans praised her evaluations and syllabus fidelity. Conservative voices, like Rep. Harrison, frame the lesson as indoctrination unfit for public funds.

Students are divided: some support inclusive texts reflecting real-world diversity; others prefer traditional views. Nationally, enrollment in gender studies has declined amid controversies, prompting program cuts.

💼 Navigating Careers in a Polarized Landscape

For aspiring lecturers and professors, this case underscores vetting institutional climates. Platforms like lecturer jobs on AcademicJobs.com list opportunities with policy transparency. Current faculty should:

• Document syllabus approvals and teaching alignments meticulously.
• Join unions like AAUP for legal support.
• Engage department chairs early on controversial topics.
• Explore academic CV tips emphasizing balanced expertise.

Job seekers can use Rate My Professor to gauge campus cultures and higher ed jobs for stable roles. Institutions balancing freedom and compliance may attract top talent.

Photo by Greeshma Gangadharan on Unsplash

🔮 Looking Ahead: Paths to Resolution

The lawsuit could set precedents on political influence in classrooms. Positive outcomes might include clearer guidelines protecting vetted content. Texas A&M's defense may hinge on contract terms over constitutional claims.

For higher education, fostering dialogue—perhaps via faculty senates—offers solutions. Explore university jobs or career advice to thrive amid changes. Share your experiences in the comments below, and check Rate My Professor or higher ed jobs for insights and opportunities. AcademicJobs.com supports navigating these dynamics.