The Incident at Nagano University: What Happened During the Online Class

In late November 2025, a routine online class at Nagano University in Ueda City, Nagano Prefecture, took a dramatic turn. A 40s male part-time lecturer (非常勤講師, known as hijōkin kōshi in Japanese, referring to non-tenured instructors who often handle multiple courses across institutions) was delivering a lecture to approximately 100 students. When several students logged in late—estimated at around 10 participants—the instructor became visibly frustrated. Instead of proceeding, he unleashed a series of inappropriate verbal remarks directed at the latecomers, escalating the situation to the point where he abruptly terminated the session midway. He instructed all students to exit the virtual classroom, marked the entire group as absent despite many being present on time, and even deleted the shared teaching materials, preventing any follow-up self-study.

This event, occurring on November 25, 2025 (Reiwa 7 in the Japanese calendar), highlighted tensions in modern higher education delivery, particularly in hybrid and online formats that have persisted post-COVID-19. Nagano University, a public institution founded to serve regional needs with around 1,470 undergraduate students across three faculties—Social Welfare, Environmental Tourism, and Business Informatics—found itself under scrutiny. The affected class likely fell under one of these faculties, though specifics remain undisclosed to protect privacy.

University's Swift Response: Suspension and Public Disclosure

Nagano University acted decisively. On January 28, 2026, the institution publicly announced that it had imposed a suspension (停職処分, jōshoku shobun, a formal disciplinary measure involving unpaid leave) on the lecturer, effective from January 16, 2026. The university classified the behavior as academic harassment, or akahara (アカハラ), a term defined in Japan as the abuse of one's superior position in teaching, research, or administrative roles to cause physical or mental suffering to subordinates like students or junior staff.

The administration emphasized that the actions violated internal regulations on harassment prevention and undermined the educational environment. By making the announcement public via their official website and X (formerly Twitter) account (@Nagano_Univ_PR), the university demonstrated transparency, a key element in rebuilding trust. This move aligns with Japan's national guidelines under the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), which mandate universities to address akahara promptly.

For those exploring faculty experiences in Japan, resources like Rate My Professor can offer insights into teaching styles and campus culture.

Cultural Underpinnings: Punctuality as a Pillar of Japanese Education

Japan's renowned punctuality culture, rooted in Confucian values of harmony (wa) and respect for group dynamics, plays a significant role here. In educational settings, arriving early—often 10-15 minutes before start time—is the norm; being on time is considered late, and tardiness signals disrespect. Trains run to the second, and students internalize this from elementary school, where late arrivals disrupt class rituals like greetings.

However, online classes introduce challenges. Post-pandemic surveys indicate persistent issues with technical glitches, work-study conflicts, and Zoom fatigue leading to higher lateness rates. A 2025 study by Japanese university associations noted that 20-30% of online sessions see delayed logins, straining instructors accustomed to strict discipline. While the lecturer's frustration is understandable in this context, his response crossed into harassment territory.

The Growing Tide of Academic Harassment in Japanese Universities

Akahara is not isolated. In 2023, at least 78 professors at national and public universities faced discipline for harassment, including verbal abuse. By 2025, cases surged amid increased reporting via anonymous hotlines, with MEXT data showing over 500 consultations annually across higher ed. Common forms include excessive scolding, unfair grading, and retaliation like absence marking—mirroring Nagano's case.

Part-time lecturers, comprising 40-50% of Japan's university faculty (over 100,000 nationwide), are vulnerable. Precarious employment fosters stress, sometimes manifesting as overcompensation through strictness. A 2025 Voista report highlighted 2025 as a peak year for harassment scandals in academia, from university hospitals to liberal arts departments.

• Verbal intimidation: 35% of cases
• Unfair academic penalties: 25%
• Exploitation of student labor: 20%
• Power-based exclusion: 15%

Visit higher ed career advice for tips on navigating faculty roles ethically.

Student Impacts: Psychological Toll and Academic Repercussions

For the 100 affected students, the fallout was multifaceted. Sudden absence marks could lower GPAs, affecting scholarships or job prospects in Japan's competitive market where GPAs influence 70% of graduate hiring. Psychologically, public berating in a virtual space—recorded potentially—amplifies humiliation, with studies linking such incidents to increased anxiety (up 25% in harassed students per 2025 JASSO surveys).

Stakeholder views vary: some students sympathized with punctuality enforcement, others decried collective punishment. Broader implications include eroded faculty trust, with 15% of Japanese undergrads reporting reluctance to engage post-incident per recent polls.

Social Media Echoes and Public Discourse

On X, the story trended locally, with posts garnering thousands of views. Defenders cited online lateness as rampant (e.g., "Professors deal with deliberate disruptions daily"), while critics labeled it "kindergarten tactics unfit for university." Hashtags like #アカハラ amplified calls for better training.

This mirrors 2025 trends where social media exposed 30+ university scandals, pressuring administrations.

Comparable Cases: A Pattern in Japanese Higher Ed

Similar incidents abound. In 2025, Kumamoto University disciplined a professor for repeated verbal abuse; Akita Prefectural University suspended staff for SNS coercion. Online-specific: Universities like Nihon University note policies treating late logins as absences, but escalation to abuse is rare yet punishable.

• 2025: Tokyo Welfare University MEXT warning for student mistreatment.
• 2024: Multiple cases of exam cancellations over disruptions.
• Trend: 40% rise in online akahara reports post-2023.

Institutional Policies and Prevention Measures

Nagano's response exemplifies best practices: rapid investigation via harassment committees, discipline per MEXT guidelines, and public notice. Japanese universities must now mandate annual akahara training (attendance up 50% since 2024), anonymous reporting apps, and faculty mental health support.

Photo by Damon Lam on Unsplash

Step-by-step prevention:

1. Pre-class reminders on etiquette.
2. Tech support for logins.
3. De-escalation protocols.
4. Post-incident counseling.

Future Outlook: Fostering Respectful Learning Environments

This incident underscores the need for balanced discipline in evolving edtech landscapes. With Japan's university enrollment declining (projected 10% drop by 2030 due to demographics), retaining students via positive experiences is vital. Positive steps include AI proctoring for fairness and peer mentoring.

For career seekers, higher ed jobs in Japan emphasize soft skills like communication. Check university jobs and Japan academic opportunities. Share your thoughts in comments below.