Dr. Elena Ramirez

Suspension of Santa Catarina's Anti-Racial Quotas Law in Universities: What It Means for Higher Education

From Enactment to Suspension: Timeline of Lei 19.722/2026

santa-catarina-universitiesracial-quotas-braziludesc-affirmative-actionstf-higher-educationpgr-lei-19722

New0 comments

Be one of the first to share your thoughts!

Engagement level
See more Higher Ed News Articles

The Origins of the Controversy: Affirmative Action in Santa Catarina's Universities

Affirmative action policies, known as 'cotas' in Brazil, have been instrumental in addressing historical inequalities in access to higher education. In Santa Catarina, the Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC), the state's main public university, implemented racial quotas in 2011 as part of a broader 30% reservation system: 20% for public school graduates and 10% for Black candidates, defined by phenotype.130 This mirrored national trends following Lei 12.711/2012, which mandated quotas in federal universities, upheld as constitutional by the Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF) in 2012.

Prior to quotas, Black student representation at UDESC was a mere 6.4% in 2010. By 2024, it had doubled to 17.6%, though still lagging behind the state's 23.2% Black and Brown population per IBGE 2022 data.127 Community institutions like Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina (UNOESC) and Universidade do Contestado (UNOCHAPECÓ), which receive state funding, also adopted similar systems to promote diversity.

These policies not only boosted enrollment but also graduation rates among underrepresented groups. From 2016 to 2024, higher education completion among Santa Catarina's Black population rose from 5.7% to 10.6%, though disparities persist compared to Whites at 21.7%.127

Enactment of Lei 19.722/2026: A Bold Move Against Racial Quotas

On January 22, 2026, Governor Jorginho Mello (PL) sanctioned Lei Estadual 19.722/2026, prohibiting racial, ethnic, color-based quotas, gender quotas, supplementary vacancies, or any affirmative actions tied to these criteria in state public universities and funded community institutions. Allowed exceptions include quotas for disabilities, public school origins, and low-income students. Violations trigger process nullification, R$100,000 fines per infraction, and funding cuts.39

The law applies to student admissions, faculty hiring, and staff recruitment, positioning Santa Catarina as the first state to eliminate racial quotas outright. Proponents argued it champions 'meritocracy' and reflects the state's demographics—81.5% White population—rendering racial quotas unnecessary.103 UDESC publicly opposed the bill, urging veto due to threats to autonomy and inclusion.

Swift Judicial Response: TJSC's Preliminary Suspension

Challenges flooded in from PSOL, PT, Coalizão Negra por Direitos, OAB, and others. On January 27, 2026, the Tribunal de Justiça de Santa Catarina (TJSC) issued a liminar suspending the law, penned by Desembargadora Maria do Rocio Luz Santa Ritta in the Órgão Especial.129

  • Violates constitutional principles: material equality, human dignity, anti-racism, education rights, university autonomy, democratic teaching management.
  • Contradicts STF jurisprudence affirming racial quotas' constitutionality.
  • Formal unconstitutionality: Parliamentary initiative imposing executive sanctions and interfering in education organization.
  • Irreversible effects: Nullifies ongoing vestibulares, sanctions agents, restricts funding amid academic year start.

The suspension halts immediate enforcement, preserving current processes at UDESC and others.Full TJSC decision details129

TJSC building in Florianopolis representing judicial suspension

Escalation to the STF: Gilmar Mendes, PGR, and AGU Interventions

Three Ações Diretas de Inconstitucionalidade (ADIs) reached the STF. Minister Gilmar Mendes, relator, ordered 48-hour explanations from the state and Alesc on January 27, soliciting PGR and AGU views.

On January 30, Procurador-Geral Paulo Gonet recommended precautionary suspension, warning of 'irreversible effects' on selection processes and abrupt halt to ethnic-racial quota policies without impact assessment—echoing STF precedents like the Distrito Federal case.128 The AGU, prompted by the Ministério da Igualdade Racial, echoed calls for suspension.

Santa Catarina defended the law, citing low Black/Brown proportions obviating quotas and preserving other inclusion mechanisms. PGR countered: State overreach invades federal education competence.PGR recommendation coverage128

Direct Impacts on Santa Catarina's Higher Education Institutions

UDESC, with 12 campuses and ~12,000 students, faces the brunt. Its vestibular processes integrate quotas; suspension averts chaos but uncertainty looms. Community unis like UNOESC (five campuses), UNISUL, and UNOCHAPECÓ, reliant on state funds, risked fines and FIES disruptions for private partners.

Faculty hiring, often quota-inclusive for diversity, could regress. Step-by-step: (1) Law publication triggers compliance; (2) Institutions audit processes; (3) Non-compliance leads to nullity/fines; (4) Suspension pauses this, but final STF ruling dictates future.

For students eyeing university jobs or studies, this underscores policy volatility in Brazilian higher ed.

Empirical Evidence: How Quotas Transformed Enrollment

YearBlack Students % (UDESC)Total Quota EnrolleesBlack Quota Enrollees
2010 (pre-quotas)6.4%--
2018~10-12% (inferred)1,999483
202417.6%-1,712 total Black

Data shows steady growth: From 42 quota students in 2011/2 (11.9% Black) to 1,999 in 2018/1 (24.2% Black within quotas).130127 Nationally, 71% of studies deem racial quotas positive.

Diverse group of UDESC students on campus

Diverse Stakeholder Views: A Polarized Debate

  • Supporters (Gov't, some legislators): Merit-based access; SC's demographics (18.1% non-White) don't justify race criteria; avoids 'reverse discrimination'.
  • Opponents (UDESC, UNE, PSOL, PGR, specialists): Essential for combating structural racism; proven efficacy; unconstitutional state interference in university autonomy.
  • Neutral/Pragmatic: Maintain social/low-income quotas while debating racial ones.

Experts like constitutionalists decry it as 'social setback'.129

Challenges, Solutions, and Future Outlook

Challenges: Policy whiplash disrupts planning; potential enrollment drops mirroring pre-2011 disparities. Solutions: STF likely upholds quotas per precedents; universities enhance outreach, hybrid merit-diversity models.

Outlook: Final STF merits judgment could set national precedent. For academics, monitor via higher ed career advice. Brazil's 5,349 universities grapple with inclusion amid fiscal pressures.

Actionable insights: Students, leverage remaining quotas; faculty, advocate diversity in faculty positions; institutions, audit funding ties.

Navigating Careers in Brazilian Higher Education Amid Uncertainty

For professionals, Santa Catarina offers opportunities in UDESC and community unis despite flux. Explore Brazil higher ed jobs, rate professors, or higher-ed-jobs for adjunct, research roles. Internal links promote resilience: Craft winning CVs.

In conclusion, the suspension preserves progress, but resolution shapes equitable access. Stay informed for Brazil's academic landscape evolution.

Discussion

0 comments from the academic community

Sort by:
You

Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

DER

Dr. Elena Ramirez

Contributing writer for AcademicJobs, specializing in higher education trends, faculty development, and academic career guidance. Passionate about advancing excellence in teaching and research.

Frequently Asked Questions

⚖️What is Lei 19.722/2026?

State law sanctioned Jan 22, 2026, prohibiting racial quotas in public & funded universities in Santa Catarina.

🏛️Why was the law suspended by TJSC?

Liminar on Jan 27 cited unconstitutionality, STF precedent violations, university autonomy breach. See TJSC.

📜PGR's stance on the law?

Recommends STF suspension due to irreversible effects on admissions, abrupt policy end without assessment.

📊How did quotas impact UDESC diversity?

Black students rose from 6.4% (2010) to 17.6% (2024); quota enrollees grew exponentially.

🏫Which universities are affected?

UDESC primarily; UNOESC, UNOCHAPECÓ, UNISUL if state-funded.

⚖️State's defense arguments?

81.5% White pop; meritocracy; other quotas suffice.

💰What penalties did the law impose?

Process nullity, R$100k fines, funding cuts.

🏛️STF's current role?

Gilmar Mendes relater; ADIs pending; PGR opinion filed.

🔮Future outlook for quotas in SC?

Likely STF invalidation per precedents; monitor for national ripple.

💼Career advice amid this?

Check jobs, prepare diverse CVs for Brazil unis.

📚Historical context of quotas in Brazil?

Post-2012 federal law; STF upheld 2012; widespread adoption.