🎓 The Incident at University of Tsukuba Unfolds

In early February 2026, the University of Tsukuba, a prominent national research university in Ibaraki Prefecture, northeast of Tokyo, found itself at the center of a controversy. Two associate professors posted comments on social media platform X (formerly Twitter) that were widely criticized as discriminatory toward foreign nationals, particularly international students. The university, known for its strong emphasis on science, technology, and international collaboration, issued a formal apology on February 13, 2026, acknowledging the posts contained discriminatory language and a lack of respect for other countries.

This event highlights ongoing tensions in Japanese higher education, where the government is aggressively expanding international student enrollment to bolster global competitiveness. Japan surpassed its 2033 target of 400,000 international students ahead of schedule, reaching 435,200 by June 2025. Institutions like Tsukuba are pivotal, recently granted permission to increase foreign student quotas across 11 faculties starting in the 2026 academic year. Yet, such rapid internationalization can strain campus cultures, exposing underlying biases.

The scandal drew immediate attention on social media, with users expressing outrage over the implications for foreign students who contribute significantly to research output and tuition revenue. Discussions emphasized the need for faculty to model inclusive behavior, especially as universities navigate diversity challenges.

Details of the Controversial Social Media Posts

The first post came from an associate professor in the Institute of Health and Sport Sciences. Responding to a discussion about talented foreign talent preferring U.S. institutions, he stated: "Foreigners who come to universities in Japan are usually incompetent and troublemakers." He elaborated from personal experience, noting that incoming foreign researchers or students often lack qualifications and cause issues, leading him to ignore emails from unknown foreigners and only accept those vetted through conferences.

This generalization painted international students as inherently problematic, ignoring the rigorous selection processes many undergo, such as Japan's MEXT scholarships or competitive graduate admissions. Critics argued it perpetuates stereotypes without evidence, potentially deterring high-caliber applicants.

The second incident involved an associate professor in the humanities and social sciences, specializing in comparative politics and Thailand. Her post commented on Thailand's recent political developments in a manner deemed disrespectful to the nation, lacking cultural sensitivity. While specifics were not publicly quoted verbatim by media to avoid further amplification, it was flagged alongside the first as violating standards of respect.

These posts, made publicly on X, quickly went viral, amplified by screenshots and threads dissecting their implications. Social media users pointed out the irony: faculty at a university promoting global partnerships making such remarks.

• Key elements of the first post: Generalization based on 'experience'; policy of ignoring unsolicited foreign contacts.
• Second post: Political commentary lacking respect for Thailand's sovereignty.
• Platform: X, where academic discourse intersects with public opinion.

University of Tsukuba's Formal Apology and Investigation

On February 13, 2026, Tsukuba University published a statement on its official news page titled "Regarding the Social Media Post." The full text reads (translated): "In a social media post by a faculty member of our university, there were discriminatory expressions against foreigners and a lack of respect for the country in question. This may violate our university's employment rules or social media usage guidelines, and we are currently conducting an investigation. We deeply apologize to those who were made to feel uncomfortable by the content of the post."

The university committed to enforcing its Social Media Usage Guidelines, which apply to all faculty, staff, and students. It pledged stricter awareness campaigns and appropriate disciplinary action upon investigation completion. Notably, the professors' names were not disclosed, aligning with internal privacy policies, though online sleuthing identified them as Associate Professor Naoto Fujii and Associate Professor Ayako Toyama.

Read the full official apology here. This response underscores Tsukuba's proactive stance, contrasting with past scandals where universities delayed acknowledgment.

Public Backlash and Social Media Storm

The posts ignited fierce debate on X, Reddit, and Threads. Hashtags like #TsukubaDiscrimination trended briefly, with international students sharing personal stories of microaggressions. One viral thread compiled similar faculty comments from other institutions, questioning Japan's readiness for globalization.

Defenders cited 'frustrations with administrative burdens' from less-prepared students, but most condemned the sweeping negativity. Reddit's r/japan community debated free speech versus professional duty, with many calling for suspension or sensitivity training.

Media coverage from The Japan Times and Yomiuri Shimbun amplified the story, prompting the university's swift action. International alumni expressed disappointment, fearing reputational damage to Tsukuba's global rankings.

Profiles of the Faculty Members Involved

Associate Professor Naoto Fujii specializes in human physiology, focusing on heat dissipation mechanisms, exercise in hot environments, and heatstroke prevention. His research is respected, with publications on TRP channels and skin responses. No prior controversies noted.

Associate Professor Ayako Toyama researches constitutional reform, democratization, and judicial politics in Southeast Asia, particularly Thailand. Affiliated with advanced labs like Tokyo University's ROLES, her work informs policy dialogues.

Both are mid-career academics at a top-tier institution, highlighting how personal views can clash with institutional roles. Their profiles remain active, with no public deletions of the posts at time of reporting.

📊 International Students in Japanese Higher Education: The Bigger Picture

Japan's higher education sector relies heavily on international talent. With 435,200 foreign students in 2025 (up 8.2% from 2024), universities like Tsukuba host thousands, primarily from China, Vietnam, and Nepal. Tsukuba, a hub for STEM, benefits from diverse contributions to labs and publications.

Government initiatives like the Top Global University Project incentivize internationalization, yet challenges persist: language barriers, cultural adjustment, and occasional bias. Studies show foreign students face higher dropout rates due to isolation, underscoring the need for supportive environments.

• Japan's 2025 intl student total: 435,200 (MEXT data).
• Tsukuba's expansion: +Quotas in 11 faculties for 2026.
• Contributions: Boost research citations, fill demographic gaps.

For those eyeing university jobs in Japan, understanding these dynamics is crucial.

Challenges and Discrimination Experiences

International students report subtle discrimination: accent bias in job hunts, housing rejections, or faculty indifference. This Tsukuba case exemplifies how faculty attitudes trickle down, affecting advising and opportunities.

Broader surveys (e.g., JASSO) reveal 20-30% of foreign students experience exclusion. Cultural contexts like Japan's homogeneity (98% ethnic Japanese) amplify issues, but progress via DEI (Diversity, Equity, Inclusion) programs is evident.

Actionable advice for students:

• Seek programs with English tracks and intl offices.
• Build networks via conferences.
• Use platforms like Rate My Professor to gauge faculty inclusivity.

Diversity Policies and Social Media Guidelines in Japan

Most universities, including Tsukuba, have SNS guidelines prohibiting hate speech or reputational harm. Hokkaido and Tokyo University examples stress responsible use, aligning personal accounts with institutional values.

DEI efforts include bias training and affinity groups. Post-incident, Tsukuba plans enhanced sessions, modeling best practices.

Faculty should:

1. Review guidelines before posting.
2. Separate personal/professional views.
3. Engage positively with diverse viewpoints.

Implications for Academic Freedom and Inclusivity

This raises debates: Does policing speech infringe freedom? Proponents argue faculty represent institutions publicly. Balanced solutions emphasize training over censorship.

For Tsukuba, reputational recovery involves transparent updates and intl recruitment drives. Globally, similar U.S./UK cases show apologies plus reforms rebuild trust.

Photo by Korng Sok on Unsplash

Moving Forward: Solutions and Positive Steps

To foster inclusivity:

• Mandatory DEI workshops for faculty.
• Mentor matching for intl students.
• Transparent reporting mechanisms.

Prospective students can explore higher ed jobs or career advice while rating experiences on Rate My Professor. Share your story in the comments below—your voice matters in shaping safer campuses.

In summary, while regrettable, this incident spotlights growth opportunities for Japanese universities amid internationalization. AcademicJobs.com supports navigating these landscapes with resources for jobs, ratings, and advice.