Bad Professors
The latest low-rated professor reviews from students (326 reviews).
| Ranking | Comment | Institution | Created |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.00 | To start off with, she is very opinionated and rude to some of her students. She played a video in class that had NOTHING to do with the lesson, and the video contained inappropriate language and sexual references. She also has told me in class that me and her were enemies because I was a Christian and she was an atheist. She failed one of my assignments because she claimed I used AI (which i did not), and when I kindly confronted her about it, she had no proof of me using AI, and she didn't even know how to use her software correctly. She does not provide study guides or any material which her students need to use to study. She expects you to read the book and study the 200-500 different key terms, memorize them, and then take the test. This is very inconvenient and time consuming especially for students who have other courses. Oftentimes, the stuff we study in the reading and the things she "lectures" us about in class are almost never on the test. While taking the test, I have come across questions that make no sense and tons of misspelled words. Also, I have emailed her on multiple occasions asking her very general questions about the class, and she is often times very rude and careless with her responses. On the first day of class she introduced herself as a profound abortion supporter, an atheist, and I quote a ,"Bad B****". She has on many occasions made students feel bad for not having the 100% correct answer to her question that she oftentimes asks in the middle of class without any warning. During her lectures, she uses slides and power points that are very basic and genuinely not very similar to the lesson. Most of the classes I have attended she has only gotten through 2 of the 17 or more slides she has prepared because she talks about her beliefs and her opinions pretty much the entirety of the class. The assignments are basic discussion questions due every Friday by 5 and otherwise we just have tests and sometimes a quiz. Again, the material we study is never what we have to know for the test, and again she misspells words, and some questions do NOT make any sense. Lastly, she has used some students as examples in the class, and some of the questions she asks are racist and she is very entitled while lecturing and makes her students think she is better than them. She has explicitly said that she is racist in class before and that she doesn't care what her students think of her or how class goes because she is only there for the paycheck. Overall, I DON'T recommend taking this class due to the reasons listed above. Finding the same class taught by a different professor would be way better than taking this class. I by no means mean any disrespect to this professor, but I did simply list my experience in her class. I hope this helps you!! | Chattahoochee Technical College | Oct 19, 2026 |
| 1.00 | 👎👎👎👎 | Delhi University | Oct 19, 2026 |
| 1.00 | The guy hated me for no reason | Aalto University | Oct 19, 2026 |
| 1.00 | needs to retire | University of Western Australia | Oct 19, 2026 |
| 1.00 | Force u to come to class bc he doesn’t record exam questions. I hate this dude. Hate finance bc of him! | University of Melbourne | Oct 19, 2026 |
| 1.00 | Clearly lacks clinical experience | Southern Cross University | Oct 19, 2026 |
| 1.00 | don't listen to any of the reviews, completely useless and unclear on every assignment. lectures are not engaging in the slightest and tutorials are surface level that do not provide any insight into the content. | Curtin University | Oct 19, 2026 |
| 1.00 | Had this guy teach one of my advanced finance classes at Victoria university of Wellington. The class started off alright until another student shouted out "You suck!", and rightly so because this guy does suck. He's too busy throwing white board markers and watching Kippy285gamer and not actually teaching us anything, and not to mention the silly comments he makes about the Bay Olympic women's first team. As long as Mr Conway teaches this class WOULD NOT RECOMMEND. | Victoria University of Wellington | Oct 19, 2026 |
| 1.00 | Kate is sneaky and I wouldn’t trust her. She is only out for herself and doesn’t care how that impacts students. | Curtin University | Oct 19, 2026 |
| 1.00 | Makes simple stuff complicated | Eindhoven University of Technology | Oct 18, 2026 |
| 1.00 | Outrageous exam questions that only test raw memory(not actual understanding) of the outdated book he makes us read. He focuses more on english and reading skills than computer science and AI. Lectures are chaotic and the information barely connects to what we are actually doing in the real world. He should teach at the humanities uni not computer science! | Leiden University | Oct 18, 2026 |
| 2.00 | Doesn't actually do anything | University of Queensland | Oct 18, 2026 |
| 1.00 | Wish I hadn't had her | University of Queensland | Oct 18, 2026 |
| 1.00 | Wish I hadn't had him | University of Queensland | Oct 18, 2026 |
| 2.00 | G | Paris Sciences et Lettres (PSL Research University Paris) | Oct 17, 2026 |
| 1.00 | Talks with his eyes closed, in a monotone voice, rude and lectures are boring and unhelpful, will have to teach yourself the entire course | Dalhousie University | Oct 17, 2026 |
| 1.00 | Half the class dropped the module | University College Cork | Oct 17, 2026 |
| 2.00 | Always goes the extra mile for students, and this is the problem. A simple concept becomes a hard material, when explained by him. If you want to overthink a simple shift in supply and demand and know more about rubber duckies, take this course; in any other case, better choose some other course where professor is less talkative. | University of Amsterdam | Oct 16, 2026 |
| 1.00 | Awful. She’s been here for 40yrs, so I respect her length in the industry. Her teaching style is downright awful. Her lectures are rambling messes with zero clarity for exams. | Munster Technological University | Oct 15, 2026 |
| 2.00 | exstudent. professor doesnt read papers his entire career. doesnt write grant proposals. just gives vague unclear "wants" because a topic is hot like "quantum" or something else. doesn't present, doesnt give talks, doesnt discuss the physics, 99% proposal drafts by us students, and he just comments on the write up flow. cannot deliver awarded grants so moves to industry grants. instrction to us is like the worse AI prompts - "write a grant on the hottest topic, with some quantum because it is a hot topic" kind of thing. very out of touch, heard his previous batch of students really carried him up to his current position. and also very rude, dismissive and like to say bad things about other faculty and students. | Nanyang Technological University, Singapore | Oct 15, 2026 |
| 1.00 | Basically calls you an idiot in class if your wrong | RMIT University | Oct 15, 2026 |
| 1.00 | Dogshit | University of the Sunshine Coast | Oct 14, 2026 |
| 1.00 | Unsupportive, lacks empathy and content expertise. | University of Melbourne | Oct 13, 2026 |
| 1.00 | pretentious, snobby, rude, ignorant, narcissistic. | Texas Southmost College | Oct 12, 2026 |
| 1.00 | Worst professor to take Finance courses with her. I'd definitely avoid her. She doesn't even know how to talk with a student. | American University of Sharjah | Oct 12, 2026 |