Background to the Respect at Uni Study
Australian universities have long prioritized creating environments where all members of the campus community feel valued and secure. In May 2024, the Australian Government commissioned the Australian Human Rights Commission to conduct a comprehensive national study examining racism, antisemitism, Islamophobia, and the experiences of First Nations people within the higher education sector. The resulting Respect at Uni report, formally titled Respect at Uni: Study into antisemitism, Islamophobia, racism and the experience of First Nations people, was released on 17 February 2026. It draws on more than 76,000 accounts from students and staff across the country, providing one of the largest datasets on these issues in Australian tertiary education.
The study builds on earlier sector initiatives such as the Respect. Now. Always. program launched in 2016, which focused on preventing sexual harm. This newer effort shifts attention to racial discrimination and hate, reflecting heightened concerns following global events that have amplified tensions on campuses worldwide. Universities Australia, the peak body representing 39 Australian universities, has now issued a formal response outlining concrete steps forward.
Key Findings from the Respect at Uni Report
The report reveals that racism remains deeply embedded in many aspects of university life. Approximately 70 percent of survey respondents reported experiencing indirect racism, such as witnessing or hearing racist comments or behaviors directed at their communities. Direct experiences of discrimination were also widespread, affecting academic performance, mental health, and sense of belonging for students and staff alike. Antisemitism and Islamophobia showed notable increases, alongside ongoing challenges faced by First Nations peoples in navigating institutional structures.
Structural issues emerged as a core theme, including inconsistent complaints processes, limited cultural awareness training, and gaps in leadership accountability. The report issues 47 recommendations aimed at both government and individual institutions, emphasizing the need for a coordinated national approach aligned with the Australian Human Rights Commission’s National Anti-Racism Framework. Five interconnected outcomes are highlighted: establishing a national anti-racism framework for universities, creating inclusive and safe campuses free from racism, ensuring accountable institutions with trusted complaints mechanisms, supporting affected individuals effectively, and fostering broader cultural change across the sector.
Universities Australia’s Formal Response
On 3 June 2026, Universities Australia released its official response to the report, affirming a sector-wide commitment to immediate and sustained action. The statement underscores that every student and staff member deserves protection, dignity, and inclusion, with racism having no place in Australian universities. Chief Executive Officer Luke Sheehy noted that while progress has been made, more work remains, and universities are uniting around shared principles for meaningful improvement.
The response explicitly adopts three guiding principles for preventing and responding to racism and hate. First, proactive prevention involves embedding evidence-based measures across all university operations. Second, effective action requires early and decisive responses, integrating informed strategies into governance, policy development, education programs, and support services. Third, a clear commitment to respect and inclusion means actively cultivating cultures of belonging where diversity is celebrated rather than merely tolerated.
Focus on Campus Safety and Respect Initiatives
Campus safety extends beyond physical security to encompass emotional and cultural wellbeing. Universities Australia’s response stresses the importance of tailored, context-specific strategies that address the unique needs of diverse student populations, including international students, First Nations communities, and those from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds. Institutions are encouraged to review and strengthen existing policies on harassment, discrimination, and hate speech, ensuring they align with the report’s recommendations.
Many universities are already expanding training programs for staff and students on recognizing and addressing bias. Others are enhancing reporting systems to make them more accessible and trauma-informed. The sector-wide approach promoted by Universities Australia aims to reduce duplication of effort while allowing flexibility for institutions to adapt measures to their local contexts, such as regional campuses or those with high proportions of international enrolments.
Photo by Dominic Kurniawan Suryaputra on Unsplash
Stakeholder Perspectives and Sector Implications
University leaders have welcomed the report as a catalyst for deeper reflection and reform. Student associations and staff unions have called for transparent implementation timelines and greater student involvement in shaping responses. Government officials, including through the Department of Education, have indicated they are considering the 47 recommendations alongside related work by special envoys on antisemitism and Islamophobia.
The implications reach beyond individual campuses. Enhanced focus on respect and safety can improve student retention and success rates, particularly for underrepresented groups. It also supports Australia’s reputation as a destination for international education, where perceptions of inclusivity play a significant role in enrolment decisions. For academic job seekers and administrators, these developments signal evolving expectations around equity, diversity, and inclusion competencies in hiring and professional development.
Existing Frameworks and Building on Prior Work
Australian universities operate within a robust regulatory environment overseen by the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency. The new response complements ongoing efforts such as the National Student Safety Survey and the Universities Accord recommendations for a national student charter focused on welfare and safety. By integrating anti-racism measures into these broader wellbeing strategies, institutions can create holistic support systems that address multiple forms of harm simultaneously.
Examples from individual universities illustrate varied approaches. Some have established dedicated equity and diversity offices with expanded mandates, while others are piloting peer support networks and cultural competency modules embedded in orientation programs. These initiatives demonstrate the practical application of the principles outlined in the Universities Australia statement.
Challenges in Implementation
Translating recommendations into action presents several challenges. Resource allocation remains a concern for smaller or regional institutions. Balancing free speech principles with protections against hate speech requires careful policy design. Additionally, measuring the effectiveness of interventions demands robust data collection and evaluation frameworks that respect privacy while providing accountability.
Universities Australia acknowledges these complexities and advocates for ongoing collaboration with government, the Australian Human Rights Commission, and community organizations representing affected groups. Continuous improvement, rather than one-off measures, is positioned as essential for lasting cultural change.
Future Outlook and Actionable Steps for Institutions
Looking ahead, the sector anticipates further guidance from government on implementing the report’s recommendations. Universities are expected to publish progress reports and share best practices through Communities of Practice facilitated by Universities Australia. For PhD candidates and early-career academics, opportunities may arise in research on anti-racism interventions or in roles supporting equity initiatives.
Actionable insights for administrators include conducting internal audits of complaints processes, investing in staff development, and engaging students as co-creators of respectful campus cultures. International partnerships could also offer models from other countries facing similar challenges in higher education settings.
Supporting Resources and Sector Collaboration
Institutions seeking additional guidance can refer to resources developed by the Australian Human Rights Commission and the Department of Education. Collaboration across the 39 member universities of Universities Australia will be key to achieving consistent standards while respecting institutional autonomy. This unified front strengthens the collective capacity to foster environments where academic excellence thrives alongside mutual respect.
