Photo by Tapan Kumar Choudhury on Unsplash
In the high-stakes world of academic research, where originality is the cornerstone of credibility, a shocking incident has emerged from Bengaluru, India. Vijayalakshmi S, a dedicated economics researcher at RV University, found herself at the center of a bizarre scandal: her unpublished study was stolen, hawked on Telegram channels for authorship slots, published under foreign names without her knowledge, and then—ironically—she was flagged as the plagiarist.
Photo by Brett Jordan on Unsplash
The Moment of Discovery: A Researcher's Worst Nightmare
Early in 2026, Vijayalakshmi S resubmitted her economics paper—titled something akin to an analysis of infrastructure policy impacts using public data—to another journal after initial rejection. To her utter dismay, the journal rejected it again, citing high similarity to an already published article in the Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development (JIPD). Upon investigation, she realized the JIPD paper was hers: identical data points, literature review, references, and even phrasing.
"This is not their paper at all. This is my paper, which I have written without anybody’s help," she declared on LinkedIn, tagging the fraudulent authors.Crafting an impeccable academic CV suddenly seemed trivial compared to protecting one's intellectual property.
The timeline traces back to January 2024, when she first submitted to Springer Nature's Discover Energy, which suggested revisions during peer review. She also presented it at IIT Bombay's Young Scholar Initiative Conference but held off on preprints to preserve blinded review anonymity. Little did she know, her work had been pilfered.
Photo by Vizag Explore on Unsplash
Profile of the Victim: Vijayalakshmi S at RV University
RV University, a private institution in Bengaluru known for its focus on interdisciplinary research, employs Vijayalakshmi S in its economics department. Bengaluru, often called India's Silicon Valley, hosts a thriving academic ecosystem with institutions like Indian Institute of Science (IISc) and IIT Bombay collaborations driving innovation. Yet, for early-career researchers like her, the pressure to publish amid 'publish or perish' culture is immense—especially in India, where PhD completions, faculty promotions, and even higher ed faculty jobs hinge on publication counts.
Her study drew from publicly available government data on infrastructure economics, a critical area for India's development goals under initiatives like Smart Cities Mission. This made it ripe for theft, as mills can repackage such analyses with minimal effort.
Photo by srinivas bandari on Unsplash
Unraveling the Theft Mechanism: Telegram's Dark Underbelly
Enter Ashutosh Tiwari, a whistleblower with insider knowledge of paper mills—he once paid a mill 10,000 INR for quick Scopus-indexed publication during his PhD but later retracted and republished ethically. Using keywords from S's paper, he scoured Telegram and found a December 29 ad offering authorship: 15,000 INR (~$165) for first author, 10,000 INR (~$110) for second, and 5,000 INR (~$55) for others.
Telegram, with lax moderation, has become a hub for such illicit trades in India—from exam leaks to fake papers. Channels peddle 'guaranteed publications' in Scopus/UGC-CARE journals, fueling a multimillion-dollar industry. This mirrors global trends but hits India hard, where publication metrics dominate evaluations.Explore legitimate research assistant jobs to bypass these traps.
Photo by Rahul Dolai on Unsplash
From Theft to Publication: The JIPD Episode
The stolen manuscript landed at EnPress Publisher's JIPD in April 2024, published September 2024. Listed authors: Mohammed Ahmar Uddin (Dhofar University, Oman), affiliates in India and Saudi Arabia—unlikely networks screaming paper mill.View the fraudulent paper.
JIPD's associate editor Jun Xie didn't respond; Scopus delisted the journal in January 2025 amid quality concerns. Uddin claimed plagiarism checks passed, data was public, and denied mill involvement: "I assure you that I am capable enough." S received an odd email offering a 'replacement' paper—shocking her further.
Photo by Brett Jordan on Unsplash
The Cruel Irony: Victim Accused of Plagiarism
In a twist, S's resubmission triggered plagiarism flags against her own work. Journals use tools like iThenticate, which match her draft to the published theft. This underscores flaws: similarity scores ignore context, provenance.
India's UGC (University Grants Commission) Regulations on Curbing Plagiarism (2018, updated 2023) mandate checks, categorizing 10-40% similarity as moderate, over 60% severe. But they don't address theft. S's case demands nuanced verification.
Photo by Brett Jordan on Unsplash
Paper Mills: A Growing Menace in Indian Higher Education
Paper mills—organized frauds selling ghostwritten/stolen papers—exploit India's 5,000+ universities' publication pressures. Retraction Watch notes surging retractions: India third globally (after China, US), skyrocketing post-2022 due to plagiarism, data fab.
- 2025: NIRF rankings first penalized retractions; harsher in 2026.
- JNU prof's 2025 petition exposed mills selling PhDs.
- Telegram channels offer slots linked to 1000s suspect papers.
Stakeholders: Victims lose years; unis face reputational hits; journals scramble with AI detectors.
Photo by Jepretualang on Unsplash
Statistics Painting a Grim Picture
India's research output boomed—5349 universities—but misconduct shadows it. 2025 saw plagiarism retractions up 300% since 2020; overall retractions hit record highs.
| Misconduct Type | India Share (2025) | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Plagiarism | 45% | 1st |
| Duplication | 25% | 2nd |
| Data Fab/Fals. | 15% | 3rd |
Source: Retraction Watch database.
Photo by Monis Yousafzai on Unsplash
Institutional Responses and Gaps
RV University silent so far; Springer Nature probing. IIT Bombay unresponded. UGC urges vigilance, but enforcement lags. Experts call for blockchain timestamps, mandatory provenance declarations.
Photo by Brett Jordan on Unsplash
Impacts on Careers and Trust in Academia
For S, stalled publications risk promotions, grants. Broader: Erodes global trust in Indian research; intl collaborations wary. Students suffer as mentors prioritize metrics over mentorship.
Cultural context: In India, API scores dictate hires; adjuncts, postdocs chase volumes.Adjunct professor jobs amplify pressures.
Photo by Hussain Ahmad Awaisi on Unsplash
Pathways to Prevention: Actionable Strategies
- Tech Tools: Use Turnitin pre-submission; ORCID for ownership.
- Best Practices: Timestamp drafts via notary/email; post safe preprints on Zenodo.
- Institutional: Ethics modules, plagiarism cells per UGC.
- Policy: NIRF penalties; AI detectors for mills.
- Whistleblowing: Platforms like Retraction Watch.
UGC PhD Regulations emphasize integrity.
Looking Ahead: Rebuilding Trust in Indian Research
As 2026 unfolds, cases like S's spur reforms. With EU/UK tightening collaborations, India must prioritize quality. Researchers: Document rigorously; unis: Foster ethics. Platforms like Rate My Professor, Higher Ed Jobs, and Career Advice aid legit paths. Share your story in comments—strengthen the community.
Find university jobs in India ethically. Post a job to attract genuine talent.
