Background on China's Journal Evaluation Landscape
China's academic community has long relied on structured journal rankings to guide research assessment, funding decisions, and career progression. For over two decades, the National Science Library of the Chinese Academy of Sciences maintained a widely used classification system that divided journals into zones based on citation metrics and disciplinary relevance. This framework influenced evaluations at universities across the country, from top institutions like Tsinghua University and Peking University to regional colleges.
In April 2026, the CAS library discontinued updates to its ranking, creating uncertainty among researchers and administrators. The move prompted discussions about the future of research evaluation in Chinese higher education. Shortly afterward, Xinrui Scholar introduced the XinRui Journal Ranking as a successor system, maintaining similar classification methods while operating as an independent platform.
The Emergence of XinRui Journal Ranking
Xinrui Scholar launched the 2026 XinRui Journal Ranking in the wake of the CAS discontinuation. The system categorizes journals into partitions or zones, drawing on data from international sources like Clarivate's Journal Citation Reports. It covers fields including natural sciences, engineering and technology, and medicine, providing a structured way to assess journal quality and influence within the Chinese context.
Unlike purely commercial products, Xinrui Scholar has emphasized free public access to the ranking itself. This approach echoes the public-service orientation of the previous CAS list while positioning the new framework as a practical tool for academics and institutions navigating evaluation needs.
How the XinRui Framework Works
The XinRui ranking organizes journals using a combination of citation analysis and subject-specific classifications. Journals are grouped into broad categories and subcategories, with performance measured through metrics that reflect both global visibility and relevance to Chinese research priorities. Updates occur annually, allowing institutions to track shifts in journal standing over time.
University administrators and faculty committees use these partitions to inform decisions on where to submit manuscripts, allocate resources, and evaluate research outputs. The framework supports a balanced view that considers both quantitative indicators and disciplinary context, helping to address some limitations of single-metric approaches.
Impact on Chinese Universities and Researchers
At major research universities, the XinRui ranking has quickly become a reference point for internal assessments. Departments in engineering and life sciences report using the zones to guide publication strategies and tenure reviews. Smaller institutions and teaching-focused colleges also consult the list when advising early-career researchers on journal selection.
Researchers note that the continuity in methodology reduces disruption. Many appreciate the free access, which lowers barriers compared to subscription-based international databases. Early adopters include journals from publishers like Tech Science Press, which have highlighted improved placements in the 2026 edition.
Photo by Shubham Sharan on Unsplash
Perspectives from Academics and Administrators
Faculty members across disciplines describe the XinRui framework as a pragmatic response to the CAS closure. One professor at a leading Beijing institution observed that the new system maintains familiar structures while allowing room for evolution. Administrators at provincial universities emphasize its utility in aligning local research priorities with national evaluation standards.
Some voices call for ongoing refinement. Scholars suggest incorporating additional indicators beyond citations, such as open-access practices or interdisciplinary reach, to better reflect the diversity of Chinese research contributions. These conversations reflect broader efforts to strengthen evaluation practices in higher education.
Comparison with International Systems
The XinRui ranking operates alongside global tools like Clarivate's Journal Citation Reports. While JCR provides worldwide impact factors, XinRui offers China-specific partitioning that accounts for regional research ecosystems. This dual approach allows institutions to balance international benchmarks with domestic relevance.
Observers note parallels with other emerging alternatives, including the Dongbi Index. Together, these systems signal a shift toward multiple evaluation frameworks rather than reliance on a single list. Chinese universities increasingly draw on several sources when making strategic decisions about research investment and collaboration.
Challenges and Opportunities
Transitioning to the XinRui framework presents both challenges and opportunities. Some researchers express concern about potential commercialization pressures, though the platform has committed to keeping core ranking data freely available. Others see potential for greater transparency and adaptability in future iterations.
Opportunities include enhanced support for emerging Chinese journals and better alignment with national goals in science and technology. The framework can help universities demonstrate research strengths in funding applications and international partnerships. Ongoing dialogue among stakeholders will shape how the system evolves.
Future Outlook for Research Evaluation in China
As Chinese higher education continues to expand, evaluation frameworks like XinRui will play a central role in maintaining quality and competitiveness. Policymakers and university leaders are watching adoption rates closely, with expectations that the system will integrate feedback from the academic community.
Longer-term developments may include greater emphasis on responsible metrics, support for open science, and tools tailored to interdisciplinary work. The XinRui ranking represents one step in this direction, offering a domestically grounded alternative that complements global standards.
Implications for Career Development
For PhD students and early-career academics, understanding the XinRui framework provides practical guidance on publication choices. Job seekers targeting Chinese universities benefit from familiarity with how institutions apply these rankings in hiring and promotion processes. Resources on academic career pathways can help navigate these considerations effectively.
Conclusion and Next Steps
The emergence of the XinRui Journal Ranking marks a significant development in China's approach to research assessment. By building on established methods while introducing an independent platform, it addresses immediate needs following the CAS discontinuation. Continued engagement from universities, researchers, and publishers will determine its lasting influence on higher education practices.
Academics interested in exploring opportunities in Chinese institutions can review current openings and career resources tailored to the sector.
