Dr. Elena Ramirez

Deep Earth Seismology Breakthrough: Stanford Maps Mysterious Mantle Earthquakes for the First Time

First Global Catalog of Continental Mantle Earthquakes from Stanford Research

geophysics-researchhigher-education-researchresearch-publication-newsstanford-universitydeep-earth-seismology
New0 comments

Be one of the first to share your thoughts!

Add your comments now!

Have your say

Engagement level

See more Research Publication News Articles

white and brown concrete building under blue sky during daytime

Photo by Y S on Unsplash

Stanford's Pioneering Discovery in Deep Earth Seismology

In a landmark achievement for deep earth seismology, researchers at Stanford University's Doerr School of Sustainability have produced the first comprehensive global map of continental mantle earthquakes—rare seismic events originating not in the brittle crust but deep within the planet's upper mantle. This breakthrough, detailed in the prestigious journal Science, catalogs 459 such earthquakes since 1990, challenging long-held assumptions about where and how earthquakes can occur. 58 61

These mysterious quakes, previously thought to be nearly impossible due to the mantle's ductile nature, provide unprecedented insights into Earth's internal dynamics. Led by former PhD student Shiqi (Axel) Wang and senior author Professor Simon L. Klemperer, the study employs an innovative seismic wave analysis to pinpoint their locations, clustered notably beneath the Himalayas and the Bering Strait region. 60

This research not only advances fundamental understanding of plate tectonics but also underscores the vital role of U.S. universities like Stanford in cutting-edge geophysics. As higher education continues to drive such discoveries, opportunities abound for students and faculty in seismology programs nationwide.

The Enigma of Mantle Earthquakes: Beyond the Crust

Earthquakes are typically associated with the Earth's crust, the outermost layer where rocks remain brittle under relatively low temperatures and pressures, fracturing along faults to release stress. The Mohorovičić discontinuity, or Moho, marks the boundary between this 5-70 kilometer-thick crust and the underlying mantle, a semisolid zone extending about 2,900 kilometers toward the core. 61

In the mantle, higher temperatures (up to 1,000°C in the upper mantle) and pressures render rocks viscous, flowing slowly like taffy rather than snapping. Yet, evidence has mounted over the past decade that rare 'continental mantle earthquakes' (CMEs) do occur below the Moho in stable continental interiors, far from subduction zones where deep quakes are more common. 59

Prior to this Stanford study, fewer than 100 such events were confidently identified worldwide, limited by detection challenges. These quakes pose no surface threat due to their depth (often 50+ miles), but they illuminate mantle rheology—the study of rock deformation—and its role in continental evolution. 127

Global map of continental mantle earthquakes identified by Stanford researchers, showing clusters in Himalayas and Bering Strait

Innovative Detection: The Sn/Lg Seismic Wave Ratio Method

The game's changing innovation from Wang and Klemperer is a waveform-based discriminant using two regional seismic phases: Sn ('lid') waves and Lg waves. Sn waves are high-frequency shear waves guided along the uppermost mantle's 'lid' (the lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary), while Lg waves are crustal-guided surface waves that attenuate quickly in the mantle. 60 158

  • Step 1: Collect global seismic data from stations since 1990, yielding over 46,000 candidate events.
  • Step 2: Compute Sn/Lg amplitude ratios for each quake, comparing to nearby crustal references.
  • Step 3: Adjust for crustal thickness (thicker crust boosts Lg); low Sn/Lg ratios flag mantle origins.
  • Step 4: Cross-validate with focal mechanisms and aftershock patterns.

This method, validated in Tibet, enables global application without local arrays, identifying CMEs ~100 times rarer than crustal quakes. 61

"Our approach is a complete game-changer," Wang noted, as it relies solely on waveforms. 60

Global Distribution: Clusters and Patterns Revealed

The resulting map unveils CMEs worldwide, but regionally patterned: a dense band from Alps to Himalayas (collision zones), East African Rift (extension), western United States (extensional tectonics), Baffin Bay (Canada), and Bering Sea surprises. 59

In the U.S., clusters under the western states align with Basin and Range extension, where mantle upwelling may trigger deep faulting. Klemperer's prior Tibet work (e.g., 2021 Sn/Lg study) informed Himalayan densities, linking to Indian-Asian collision. 148

Statistics: 459 confirmed (conservative; more with denser networks), depths 40-100 km, magnitudes mostly <4.0, post-1990 focus due to digital data. 102

Abstract wavy pattern with green, blue, and black

Photo by Logan Voss on Unsplash

Mechanisms Behind the Mystery: What Triggers CMEs?

CMEs likely arise from multiple processes in the 'petrological mantle' (brittle under stress):

  • Aftershocks: Dynamic triggering by crustal waves (e.g., remote quakes propagate stress).
  • Phase transitions: Olivine to spinel at ~410 km dehydrates, embrittling rock.
  • Hydration/metasomatism: Fluids weaken mantle, enabling faults (e.g., subducted slabs recycle water).
  • Convection: Mantle flow shears lithosphere base.

Western U.S. examples (e.g., Wyoming Craton edge) suggest craton margins prone due to lithospheric thinning. 128 Regional patterns reflect tectonics: collision thickens, rifting thins lithosphere. 127

Implications for Tectonics and Volcanism

CMEs illuminate crust-mantle coupling: Himalayas show collision penetrates Moho, driving uplift. Under western U.S., they hint at asthenospheric upwelling fueling volcanism (e.g., Yellowstone). 61

For hazard assessment, while harmless directly, they signal stress regimes influencing crustal quakes. Enhanced catalogs aid probabilistic models, safer fracking/oil exploration.Explore research jobs in geophysics at leading U.S. universities.

Link: Stanford News, Science Paper.

Diagram illustrating Sn and Lg seismic waves used in Stanford's mantle earthquake detection method

U.S. University Research: Leading the Charge in Seismology

Stanford's feat builds on U.S. leadership: USGS networks, EarthScope (USArray) provided data backbone. Programs at UC Berkeley Seismology Lab, Caltech, UT Austin's TexNet advance detection. 90

Faculty like Klemperer mentor PhDs; Wang's trajectory exemplifies paths from grad student to impactful researcher. U.S. unis offer robust seismology MS/PhD programs, NSF-funded.

Future Directions and Open Questions

Wang/Klemperer aim to expand catalogs with AI/ML on waveforms, link to geodesy (InSAR/GPS). Denser arrays (e.g., US Midwest) may reveal more. Global tectonics models incorporating CMEs could refine plate reconstructions. 61

"We want to understand how these layers function as a whole system," Wang said. 60 Ties to climate (icequakes trigger?) and resources (mantle imaging for minerals).

a cracked concrete wall with blue paint on it

Photo by Marija Zaric on Unsplash

Careers in Geophysics and Seismology: Opportunities Abound

This breakthrough highlights demand for seismologists. U.S. unis post openings: postdocs at UT Austin, faculty at AGU-listed roles, research at USGS. 81 Skills: seismic analysis, Python/MATLAB, fieldwork.

  • PhD programs: Stanford Geophysics, Caltech Seismology.
  • Jobs: Faculty positions, Postdocs.
  • Advice: Intern at IRIS, publish in Science.

Rate your professors or explore career advice for earth sciences.

Conclusion: Illuminating Earth's Hidden Depths

Stanford's mantle earthquake map transforms deep earth seismology, proving these 'impossible' events are widespread, patterned signals of mantle activity. As U.S. higher ed pioneers such work, it promises safer world via better hazard models. Stay tuned for more; find seismology jobs, higher ed opportunities, or career tips.

Discussion

0 comments from the academic community

Sort by:
You

Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

DER

Dr. Elena Ramirez

Contributing writer for AcademicJobs, specializing in higher education trends, faculty development, and academic career guidance. Passionate about advancing excellence in teaching and research.

Frequently Asked Questions

🌍What are continental mantle earthquakes?

Continental mantle earthquakes (CMEs) are rare seismic events originating below the Moho in the upper mantle under continents, unlike typical crustal quakes. Stanford identified 459 since 1990.127

📡How did Stanford detect these deep earthquakes?

Using Sn/Lg seismic wave amplitude ratios: Sn travels in mantle lid, Lg in crust. Low ratios flag mantle origins, analyzed from global data.60

🗺️Where are mantle earthquakes most common?

Clusters in Himalayas, Bering Strait, Alps-Himalaya band, East Africa, western U.S., Baffin Bay. Reflects tectonics like collision/rifting.

Why were mantle earthquakes considered impossible?

Mantle rocks are hot/viscous, flow not fracture. But under specific stresses (phase changes, fluids), they brittle-fail.

⚙️What mechanisms cause CMEs?

Aftershocks, dehydration embrittlement, hydration weakening, convection shear. Varies regionally.

🔮How does this impact earthquake prediction?

Reveals crust-mantle coupling, refines stress models for crustal hazards. Indirectly aids via better tectonics understanding.

🏫Role of Stanford Doerr School in this research?

Home to Prof. Klemperer; mentored Wang. Builds on Tibet studies. Exemplifies U.S. higher ed excellence.

🇺🇸Are there mantle quakes under the U.S.?

Yes, western states (e.g., Wyoming Craton edge), linked to extension.

🔬Future research on mantle earthquakes?

AI catalogs, link to InSAR/GPS, denser networks. Interconnected quake cycles.

💼Careers in seismology at U.S. universities?

PhDs/postdocs at Stanford, Berkeley, UT Austin. Jobs via AGU, SSA. Check higher-ed-jobs.

📚Publication details of the Stanford study?

Wang & Klemperer, Science 391(6785):611-615, 2026. DOI: 10.1126/science.adz4367.